2014
DOI: 10.1127/0941-2948/2014/0470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does the areal averaging influence the extremes? The context of gridded observation data sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such effects are mainly related to the number of stations used for calculating precipitation data in each grid, and as a result not uniform in space. For instance, more averaged stations primarily decreases the number of dry days and the highest daily precipitation totals, but increases moderate precipitation totals (Wibig et al, 2014). During creation of the PaiTuli database used by this study, cases in which the distance between stations was less than 7 km were excluded in order to justify the gridded datasets in areas with high density of stations network.…”
Section: Study Area and Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effects are mainly related to the number of stations used for calculating precipitation data in each grid, and as a result not uniform in space. For instance, more averaged stations primarily decreases the number of dry days and the highest daily precipitation totals, but increases moderate precipitation totals (Wibig et al, 2014). During creation of the PaiTuli database used by this study, cases in which the distance between stations was less than 7 km were excluded in order to justify the gridded datasets in areas with high density of stations network.…”
Section: Study Area and Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation coefficient for raw in situ data and E‐OBS data for the observation time period available average 0.98. Nevertheless, following an additional weather‐dependent analysis, the measurement site data were used as a reference in assessing the incidence of extreme climate cases since minimum air temperature is extremely sensitive to local conditions and gridded data have the tendency to underestimate the tails of the distribution (Wibig et al , ). It is especially significant in low temperatures so over‐smoothing is stronger in winter time and may also influence the number of spring and autumn frost days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shift to positive anomalies appeared in the mountains two years earlier and the annual deviations are larger (up to 4 • C in 2015, Figure 3). Since data gridding and averaging was reported Wibig et al [48] as responsible for the smoothing effect, reaching −0.2 • C for summer temperature extremes (Tx95) in Poland, the results were compared with observations from two stations which represent the average conditions for the area of ≤500 m a.s.l. (Poznań, located in the Polish lowlands) and >500 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Long-term Variability Of Summer Maximum Air Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%