2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1970311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Does the Personal Income Tax Affect the Progressivity of OASI Benefits?

Abstract: is to produce first-class research and forge a strong link between the academic community and decision-makers in the public and private sectors around an issue of critical importance to the nation's future. To achieve this mission, the Center sponsors a wide variety of research projects, transmits new findings to a broad audience, trains new scholars, and broadens access to valuable data sources.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 3 In analyzing the redistribution of old age benefits fostered by the current system, we consider the payroll tax, but not the income taxation of Social Security. In a paper written at the same time as the present paper, Coe et al (2011) do not find that income taxation of Social Security creates large changes in the measured progressivity of Social Security at the household level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 47%
“… 3 In analyzing the redistribution of old age benefits fostered by the current system, we consider the payroll tax, but not the income taxation of Social Security. In a paper written at the same time as the present paper, Coe et al (2011) do not find that income taxation of Social Security creates large changes in the measured progressivity of Social Security at the household level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…2 See Gustman and Steinmeier (2001); Liebman (2002); Coronado, Fullerton and Glass (2011); Coe, Karamcheva, Kopcke and Munnell (2011); and Gustman, Steinmeier and Tabatabai (2013). These studies show that although the Social Security benefit formula is designed to redistribute benefits toward individuals with low lifetime earnings, there is much less redistribution of benefits at the household level than at the individual level, i.e., from households with high lifetime covered earnings to households with low covered earnings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%