2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does the pore-throat size control the reservoir quality and oiliness of tight sandstones? The case of the Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation in the southern Songliao Basin, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
98
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
98
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dong et al demonstrated that the slippage effect is more remarkable in smaller throats by comparing volcanic core samples with similar permeabilities, but different throat size distributions [19]. The depositional environments result in complicated throat size distributions in a tight formation, which implies that the contribution of the slippage effect to the absolute permeability would significantly change in distinct pore-throat systems [20,21]. Nevertheless, no attempts have been made to determine the absolute/Klinkenberg permeability of a tight formation conditioned to its pore-throat systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dong et al demonstrated that the slippage effect is more remarkable in smaller throats by comparing volcanic core samples with similar permeabilities, but different throat size distributions [19]. The depositional environments result in complicated throat size distributions in a tight formation, which implies that the contribution of the slippage effect to the absolute permeability would significantly change in distinct pore-throat systems [20,21]. Nevertheless, no attempts have been made to determine the absolute/Klinkenberg permeability of a tight formation conditioned to its pore-throat systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its relationship with the permeability indicates that permeability of these tight reservoirs is determined by the throat size distribution significantly (Figure 8(a)). Empirically, permeability is mainly contributed by the part of larger throats and the increase of smaller throats in proportion decreases the permeability [28]. Comparing the throat radius distribution and the corresponding contribution to the permeability between the samples having different permeability value indicates that high permeability sample has more large throats, and the permeability result from the relative larger throat dominated the total permeability (Figure 8(b)).…”
Section: The Influence Of Pore-throat Geometry On Porosity Andmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To investigate the fluid performance in tight clastic rock reservoir, some experiments and studies returned back to the essential issues, including the pore-throat structure and physical interaction of fluid-pore-wall in the tight reservoir [6,10,13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. However, the pore-throat structures are various significantly in tight clastic rock reservoir and the fluid flow inside needs to be particularly concerned [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although air/mercury injection technique is commonly applied [17,19,20], this method has several weak points. As mercury is injected under high pressure, sensitive pores can be damaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%