How Does the UML Testing Profile Support Risk-Based Testing

Ali, Shaukat; Yue, Tao; Hoffmann, Andreas; Wendland, Marc-Florian; Bagnato, Alessandra; Brosse, É.; Schacher, Markus; Dai, Zhen Ru

doi:10.1109/issrew.2014.13

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…UML Testing Profile (UTP) [20,21] is a standard at Object Management Group (OMG) for enabling MBT. With UTP, the expected behavior of a system under test can be modeled, from where test cases can be derived.…”

Section: Uml Testing Profile (Utp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The key purpose is to introduce testing-related concepts [e.g., Test Case, Test Data, and Test Design Model and Model Libraries such as various types of test case Verdict (pass, fail)] to UML models for the purpose of enabling automated generation of test cases. UTP V.2 [21] is the latest revision of the UTP profile, which is conceptually composed of five packages of concepts: Test Analysis and Design, Test Architecture, Test Behavior, Test Data, and Test Evaluations. Various numbers of stereotypes have been defined for some concepts of these packages.…”

Section: Uml Testing Profile (Utp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various numbers of stereotypes have been defined for some concepts of these packages. Similar to other modeling notations, it is never been an objective to exhaustively apply all the stereotypes when using UTP V.2 to annotate UML models with testing concepts [21]. Which stereotypes to apply and how to apply them are however problem/purpose specific and should be defined by users of the profile.…”

Section: Uml Testing Profile (Utp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Uncertainty-Wise Cyber-Physical System test modeling

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is important that a Cyber-Physical System (CPS) with uncertainty in its behavior caused by its unpredictable operating environment, to ensure its reliable operation. One method to ensure that the CPS will handle such uncertainty during its operation is by testing the CPS with model-based testing (MBT) techniques. However, existing MBT techniques do not explicitly capture uncertainty in test ready models, i.e., capturing the uncertain expected behavior of a CPS in the presence of environment uncertainty. MBT. UncerTum was evaluated with two industrial CPS case studies, one real-world case study, and one open-source CPS case study from the following four perspectives: (1) Completeness and Coverage of the profiles and Model Libraries in terms of concepts defined in their underlying uncertainty conceptual model for CPSs, i.e., U-Model and MARTE, (2) Effort required to model uncertainty with UncerTum, and (3) Correctness of the developed test ready models, which was assessed via model execution. Based on the evaluation, we can conclude that we were successful in modeling all the uncertainties identified in the four case studies, which gives us an indication that UncerTum is sufficiently complete. In terms of modeling effort, we concluded that on average UncerTum requires 18.5% more time to apply stereotypes from UUP on test ready models.

show abstract

Section: Uml Testing Profile (Utp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Uml Testing Profile (Utp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Uml Testing Profile (Utp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Uncertainty-Wise Cyber-Physical System test modeling

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No gerenciamento de teste, são descritos conceitos para o gerenciamento de atividades de teste específicas. Além disso, há extensões a UTP como Costa et al (2013) para coordenação e Ali et al (2014) para riscos.…”

Section: Utp -Um Perfil De Teste Para a Umlunclassified

“…Esse subgrupo de teste contém elementos que fornecem bases para compreender e prevenir defeitos para sistemas de software no domínio de aplicação. No diagrama de descrição dos riscos, utilizou-se a notação definida por Ali et al (2014), que estende o UTP e é baseada na norma ISO-31000 (2009). Na descrição dos riscos devem ser descritas a probabilidade, o impacto e a prioridade para cada um dos riscos.…”

Section: Gerenciamento De Defeitosunclassified