2015
DOI: 10.15185/izawol.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How effective are financial incentives for teachers?

Abstract: ProsIncentives can effectively improve student performance if they are designed well. In developing countries, paying teachers for student performance has been shown to be highly effective at low cost. Incentives based on the collective performance of small groups of teachers strike a balance between loss of effectiveness from free-riding teachers and gains in effectiveness from teachers cooperating with each other. Innovative incentive mechanisms based on loss rather than gain or on relative student performan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, literature on the effect of pay increase on education quality is not in consensus, and one recent study shows that large unconditional pay increases for incumbent teachers had no significant impact on student outcomes in Indonesia (Joppe de Ree, Pradhan, and Rogers 2018). U.S. policymakers often suggest performance pay and a merit pay system to improve teacher quality and provide “fair” compensation to good teachers, but the literature shows mixed findings on the effect of incentive pay (Bond and Mumford 2018; Dee and Wyckoff 2015; Fryer 2013; Glazerman and Seifullah 2012; Imberman 2015). With current compensation schemes and the unpopularity of the teaching profession, it is difficult to attract high‐quality young applicants to the teaching sector and retain them, especially in disadvantaged districts (Goldhaber, Lavery, and Theobald 2015; Ingersoll and Merrill 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, literature on the effect of pay increase on education quality is not in consensus, and one recent study shows that large unconditional pay increases for incumbent teachers had no significant impact on student outcomes in Indonesia (Joppe de Ree, Pradhan, and Rogers 2018). U.S. policymakers often suggest performance pay and a merit pay system to improve teacher quality and provide “fair” compensation to good teachers, but the literature shows mixed findings on the effect of incentive pay (Bond and Mumford 2018; Dee and Wyckoff 2015; Fryer 2013; Glazerman and Seifullah 2012; Imberman 2015). With current compensation schemes and the unpopularity of the teaching profession, it is difficult to attract high‐quality young applicants to the teaching sector and retain them, especially in disadvantaged districts (Goldhaber, Lavery, and Theobald 2015; Ingersoll and Merrill 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teacher incentive pay played a similar important role in the Obama administration's Race to the Top initiative. Perhaps not surprisingly, consistent with all of these trends, the number of school districts adopting incentive schemes has increased more than 40 percent in the last decade (Imberman, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Burgess et al () show that the introduction of team‐based PP improved task allocation in HM Customs and Excise, resulting in improved team performance. Imberman (), in his review of PP effectiveness for teacher performance around the world, finds that PP can improve teacher performance but that effects depend on the design of the PP scheme. We revisit this issue by looking at performance outcomes for the representative workplace data described in the Methods section.…”
Section: Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%