2004
DOI: 10.1002/job.238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful

Abstract: SummaryThe purpose of this study was to examine how perceptions of distributive and procedural fairness moderate the relationship between innovative behavior and stress. The results of a survey carried out among 118 first-line managers from six organizations in the public health domain demonstrated that innovative behavior was positively related to the stress reactions of job-related anxiety and burnout only when levels of both distributive fairness and procedural fairness were low.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
371
4
25

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 426 publications
(411 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
11
371
4
25
Order By: Relevance
“…And during this time, employees are a key factor in innovation process (Van de Ven, 1986). It consists of creating and implementing new perspectives and ideas (Janssen, 2004). Rather than just consisting generating new ideas and solutions for situations, innovation consists also implementing those ideas (Kanter, 1988).…”
Section: Innovative Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And during this time, employees are a key factor in innovation process (Van de Ven, 1986). It consists of creating and implementing new perspectives and ideas (Janssen, 2004). Rather than just consisting generating new ideas and solutions for situations, innovation consists also implementing those ideas (Kanter, 1988).…”
Section: Innovative Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For examples, task domain expertise that comes with tenure may account for variance in innovative work behavior (Oldham & Cummings, 1996;Tierney & Farmer, 2004). Research also suggests that older workers who have been with a company for some time often are less innovative in their work because people tend to become set in their ways of doing things over time (Janssen, 2004). In addition, people with lower educational attainment may not have the cognitive capacity to Psychological Thought 2012, Vol.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies, there were four demographic characteristics that significantly influence individual innovativeness. In particular, gender, age, job tenure and education level significantly associated with individual innovativeness (Janssen, 2000;2004;Zhou, Zhang & Montoro-Sanchez, 2011) thus were controlled in this study.…”
Section: Measurement and Operationalisation Of The Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%