2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2014.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How gas adsorption and swelling affects permeability of coal: A new modelling approach for analysing laboratory test data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…McKee et al model (1988) The permeability of coal for non-or weakly adsorbing gas (such as He and N 2 ) is known to be highly stress-dependent and has been verified in laboratory tests to generally decrease exponentially with increasing effective stress in (e.g., Durucan and Edwards, 1986;Somerton et al, 1975;Shi et al, 2014). Eq.…”
Section: Review Of Permeability Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…McKee et al model (1988) The permeability of coal for non-or weakly adsorbing gas (such as He and N 2 ) is known to be highly stress-dependent and has been verified in laboratory tests to generally decrease exponentially with increasing effective stress in (e.g., Durucan and Edwards, 1986;Somerton et al, 1975;Shi et al, 2014). Eq.…”
Section: Review Of Permeability Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The permeability, which is used to describe the fluidity of the coal seam gas, is almost entirely provided by the cleats. It is known to be highly stress-dependent and has been shown to generally reduce exponentially with increasing net confining stress [52] and the stress dependency of coal permeability may be described as [53]:…”
Section: The Role Of Destress On Fracture Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permeability of coal seam changes after the injection of supercritical CO 2 . Shi et al (2014) studied the permeability of coal seam injected CO 2 . This coal seam permeability model has the same form in the cylindrical coordinates and considered the effect of pore press and strain of coal seam changes as:…”
Section: The Calculation Model Of Cement-formation Interface Debondinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method depends on the higher CO 2 adsorption/sorption capacity than CH 4 and most other adsorbing gases underground of coal seam and utilizes the injecting CO 2 from the ground to the bottom hole to replace the adsorbed CH 4 to free state (Haszeldine 2009;Mackay 2013). The injection of gas increases the pore fracture pressure and drives the free gas flowing out of the CBM production well, and thus increases the production and recovery of CH 4 (Mitra et al 2008;Shi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%