2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How has Cagliari Changed Its Citizens in Smart Citizens? Exploring the Influence of ITS Technology on Urban Social Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After this initiative, several programs developed initiatives to promote children's mobility, in particular concerning home-to-school itineraries (Pedibus and à peis programs). These projects are in line with more general policies aimed at fostering independent mobility [52], including the introduction of a bicycle-sharing service, extension of the bicycle path network, and reorganization of public open spaces. This last action is articulated in the pedestrianisation of different areas within Cagliari (e.g., Villanova and Marina districts) and of roads (e.g., Corso Vittorio Emanuele, starting from 2016), and in the revitalization of significant outdoor urban places (e.g., via Manno, piazza Garibaldi, and piazza San Michele, starting from 2017).…”
Section: Cagliari Italy and Applications To Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…After this initiative, several programs developed initiatives to promote children's mobility, in particular concerning home-to-school itineraries (Pedibus and à peis programs). These projects are in line with more general policies aimed at fostering independent mobility [52], including the introduction of a bicycle-sharing service, extension of the bicycle path network, and reorganization of public open spaces. This last action is articulated in the pedestrianisation of different areas within Cagliari (e.g., Villanova and Marina districts) and of roads (e.g., Corso Vittorio Emanuele, starting from 2016), and in the revitalization of significant outdoor urban places (e.g., via Manno, piazza Garibaldi, and piazza San Michele, starting from 2017).…”
Section: Cagliari Italy and Applications To Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Considering the organization of urban areas, the authors suggest the following guidelines: a detailed study of the possibility of promoting the mobility shift from private to public transport, while checking the attainable thresholds and town-planning implications; an exploration of the possibilities and implications of organization strategies of the primary railway hubs serving regional and metropolitan mobility, both in terms of the distribution of accessibility values that could promote evolution towards a net structure of settlement patterns, and in terms of management models; an integrated holistic approach that brings people’s needs back to the center of projects [ 35 ]. …”
Section: Results: Proposal Of a Methods Of Intervention For The Insulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, STP becomes integrated according to the logic of TOD (Transit Oriented Development). Namely, transport and territory must influence each other for having an efficient transport system [ 35 ]; The shift from Mobility (planning for cars) to Accessibility (planning for people, considering their movements) [ 36 ]; The STP is focalized on any non-motorized transport (human powered mobility) [ 37 , 38 ]; The STP considers the streets and the squares in a more complex way: they are spaces for social interaction [ 39 ]; Cost-benefit analysis of TTP is in contrast with multi-criteria analysis of STP. The multi-criteria analysis also takes into account intangible costs (e.g.…”
Section: Urban Mobility and Transport Sector: Statistic Evidencesmentioning
confidence: 99%