2023
DOI: 10.1108/tqm-10-2022-0308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How The TQM Journal has addressed “quality”: a literature review using bibliometric analysis

Abstract: PurposeThis study investigates the overall publications of The TQM Journal since its inception with an aim to identify the trending topics and emerging trends.Design/methodology/approachThe quantitative bibliometric and social network analysis techniques composed of keywords, co-occurrence network and keyword cluster detection are employed to conduct the investigation. A total of 968 papers published in The TQM Journal till August 2022 were sourced from the SCOPUS database to conduct the analysis.FindingsThe r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these studies, the most recent literature underscores multiple gaps in the analysis of tourists’ intentions and behaviors within the context of cultural destinations, including: (1) a scarcity of studies analyzing the impact of destination reputation on tourist behavior (Su et al ., 2018; Tankovic and Musanovic, 2022); (2) a lack of empirical analyses focused on aspects related to the specific dimension of cultural sustainability (De Oiliveria et al ., 2022; Magliacani and Francesconi, 2022; Wang et al ., 2021); (3) limited studies linking destination reputation to tourist satisfaction (Shrivastav, 2023; Su et al ., 2020); (4) a shortage of studies addressing the influence of on-site involvement in sustainable activities (Breiby et al ., 2020; Liu et al ., 2016); (5) the predominance of existing studies analyzing the role of cultural tourism solely from the perspective of UNESCO site managers, neglecting the demand perspective (De Oliveira et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these studies, the most recent literature underscores multiple gaps in the analysis of tourists’ intentions and behaviors within the context of cultural destinations, including: (1) a scarcity of studies analyzing the impact of destination reputation on tourist behavior (Su et al ., 2018; Tankovic and Musanovic, 2022); (2) a lack of empirical analyses focused on aspects related to the specific dimension of cultural sustainability (De Oiliveria et al ., 2022; Magliacani and Francesconi, 2022; Wang et al ., 2021); (3) limited studies linking destination reputation to tourist satisfaction (Shrivastav, 2023; Su et al ., 2020); (4) a shortage of studies addressing the influence of on-site involvement in sustainable activities (Breiby et al ., 2020; Liu et al ., 2016); (5) the predominance of existing studies analyzing the role of cultural tourism solely from the perspective of UNESCO site managers, neglecting the demand perspective (De Oliveira et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2019). Indeed, even if different authors have particularly analyzed the influence of tourists' satisfaction on their behaviors and attitudes (Shrivastav, 2023; Vojtko et al. , 2022; Su et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hung et al, 2019). Indeed, even if different authors have particularly analyzed the influence of tourists' satisfaction on their behaviors and attitudes (Shrivastav, 2023;Vojtko et al, 2022;Su et al, 2018;Lee et al, 2012), few studies have focused their attention on the possible role of sense of belonging (SOB). This construct represents a more intimate and long-lasting bond between destination and visitor (Jones et al, 2000) because it refers to an actual identifiable sentiment or attachment felt, by tourists, vis a vis the cultural destination that they have visited (Hung et al, 2019;Lin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%