2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-99867-1_90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Important Is the Physical Interpretation and the Role of the Model User in Urban Flooding Simulation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flooding depths obtained in vicinity of Piazza della Pace showed an approximate value of 1 m, with the greatest water depth reaching 1.36 m (cells 6, 7, and 8 shown in Figure 5), and they were closely related to the water depths observed by the available images of the real event. These results were also similar to those obtained by the SWMM simulation and by Occhiuto [57]. The number of each modeled cell in the watershed and the respective water depth ranges can be observed in Figure 7.…”
Section: Modcelsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flooding depths obtained in vicinity of Piazza della Pace showed an approximate value of 1 m, with the greatest water depth reaching 1.36 m (cells 6, 7, and 8 shown in Figure 5), and they were closely related to the water depths observed by the available images of the real event. These results were also similar to those obtained by the SWMM simulation and by Occhiuto [57]. The number of each modeled cell in the watershed and the respective water depth ranges can be observed in Figure 7.…”
Section: Modcelsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Later, this model was adapted to the urban environment, gaining a series of new facilities. MODCEL proved to be a useful tool when compared to different models [57] and can be found in detail in Miguez et al [44]. Some previous applications of this model can be found in the literature [21,[58][59][60][61].…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%