2019
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How individualism–collectivism influences consumer responses to the sharing economy: Consociality and promotional type

Abstract: With the explosion of online exchange of products, the sharing economy is experiencing ever-increasing growth. Despite the increasing popularity of lateral exchange market platforms as part of the sharing economy, research has not yet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior service researchers have used 'individualism/collectivism' dimension widely in analyzing service quality and customer satisfaction in different contexts (e.g. Mattila and Peterson, 2004;Rahman, 2019;Lamb et al, 2020;Mai et al, 2020). This specific aspect has not been addressed from the perspective of value co-creation in wellbeing services context, a gap in extant literature which our study is aiming to fill.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prior service researchers have used 'individualism/collectivism' dimension widely in analyzing service quality and customer satisfaction in different contexts (e.g. Mattila and Peterson, 2004;Rahman, 2019;Lamb et al, 2020;Mai et al, 2020). This specific aspect has not been addressed from the perspective of value co-creation in wellbeing services context, a gap in extant literature which our study is aiming to fill.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prior service sector focused research has established that individualistic vs. collectivistic cultural dimensions influence service context including customer satisfaction significantly (e.g. Mattila and Peterson, 2004;Chen et al, 2015;Lamb et al, 2020;Mai et al, 2020). However, so far, no prior study has specifically addressed value co-creation by consumers in the specific context of the wellbeing service sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Values in this study mean the extent to which a person has a favorable opinion and judgment of the sharing economy and what it represents [82,87,88]. Regarding consequences, it has been specifically proven that values related to sustainability and solidarity affect consumers' preferences and expectations associated with Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) [89][90][91][92]. EWOM is defined as the information exchanges, evaluations and comments made through sites [93].…”
Section: The Importance Of Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second theme, segmentation, addresses the question: “Who participates in the sharing economy and what realms do they participate in?” An empirical study by Hartl et al (2020) explores the motives behind carpooling. Drawing upon identity theory, conclusions are discussed with reference to concepts such as “environmentalist identity.” Mai et al (2020) examine cultural aspects of purchase intention with regard to sharing economy platforms. Lastly, the previously published work of Stofberg and Bridoux (2019) investigated free models versus transaction‐based models of sharing, and the parameters of consumer preference for type of sharing platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%