1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0933-3657(98)00044-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How knowledge drives understanding—matching medical ontologies with the needs of medical language processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical pragmatics -getting the clinical dialogue right so that it fits into daily tasks and practice. Clinical computational linguistics is a relatively well developed field with significant successes such as the Linguistic String Project [20], the work of Scherrer, Baud, Rassinoux and others in Geneva [21][22][23][24], and others [25,26].…”
Section: The Importance Of Clinical Pragmaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical pragmatics -getting the clinical dialogue right so that it fits into daily tasks and practice. Clinical computational linguistics is a relatively well developed field with significant successes such as the Linguistic String Project [20], the work of Scherrer, Baud, Rassinoux and others in Geneva [21][22][23][24], and others [25,26].…”
Section: The Importance Of Clinical Pragmaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One challenge of designing the mapping system is the diverse forms of an anatomical entities. Named entities related to body parts, organs, and their subparts are defined as anatomical entities [4]. In this paper, we use the phrase “anatomical related entities” to denote named entities and their related medical terms, including problems, medical tests, and treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the existence of such terminological resources does not guarantee their utility for NLP. In particular, we have two core requirements for lexical resources for NLP in addition to the basic enumeration of important domain terms: representation of morphosyntactic information about those terms, specifically part of speech information and inflectional patterns to support parsing and lemma assignment, and representation of semantic information indicating general categorical information about terms and significant relations between terms, to support text understanding and inference (Hahn et al, 1999). Biomedical vocabularies by and large commonly leave out morphosyntactic information, and where they address semantic considerations, they often do so in an unprincipled manner, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%