2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How many names are enough? Identifying network effects with the least set of listed contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of name generator sets used depended on the number of roles in which each participant was engaged. To reduce stakeholder fatigue, the maximum number of ties was capped at 10 per question and ties were limited to the past 5 years (Merluzzi and Burt, 2013).…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of name generator sets used depended on the number of roles in which each participant was engaged. To reduce stakeholder fatigue, the maximum number of ties was capped at 10 per question and ties were limited to the past 5 years (Merluzzi and Burt, 2013).…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, each respondent (referred to as ego) was asked to list the initials of up to five individuals who are important sources of professional advice (whom you approach when you have a work-related problem or you want advice on a decision you have to make) (Ibarra, 1992). As found by Merluzzi and Burt (2013), five names are considered to be the cost effective number to be requested, enough to reveal network effects. For each contact in the network (referred to as an alter), the respondent was asked for information about the strength of the connection (close, less close, weak) and this party's gender.…”
Section: Social Network (Constraint and Betweenness Centrality)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also added two additional name generators, and asked each respondent to name the people who provide them with tangible health support and spiritual support. We did not restrict the number of names a respondent could provide for each name generator, as there have been inconsistencies in the social network literature regarding the appropriate name generator limit, which may vary by context (Merluzzi and Burt 2013).…”
Section: Name Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%