2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00359-021-01533-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How might magnetic secular variation impact avian philopatry?

Abstract: A tendency to return to the natal/breeding site, ‘philopatry’, is widespread amongst migratory birds. It has been suggested that a magnetic ‘map’ could underpin such movements, though it is unclear how a magnetic map might be impacted by gradual drift in the Earth’s magnetic field (‘secular variation’). Here, using the International Geomagnetic Reference Field, we quantified how secular variation translates to movement in the implied positions at which combinations of different magnetic cues (inclination, decl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since there are no known sensory modalities that can provide this level of precision over such a large geographical scale, our model suggests that agents would still benefit from collective navigation strategies. Nevertheless, it would be difficult for an animal to rely exclusively on the magnetic field for a multi-year migration since the geomagnetic field drifts over time [29]. This would indicate that either an alternative sensory cue is still necessary, or that the high variance in individual's responses to magnetic cues is an evolutionary adaptation to ensure the success of some individuals despite secular drift [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since there are no known sensory modalities that can provide this level of precision over such a large geographical scale, our model suggests that agents would still benefit from collective navigation strategies. Nevertheless, it would be difficult for an animal to rely exclusively on the magnetic field for a multi-year migration since the geomagnetic field drifts over time [29]. This would indicate that either an alternative sensory cue is still necessary, or that the high variance in individual's responses to magnetic cues is an evolutionary adaptation to ensure the success of some individuals despite secular drift [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, viewing magnetic parameters as context-specific indicators 43 , or step-wise cues 44 , rather than coordinates on a map, may yield further breakthroughs in understanding how animals sense and use magnetic fields. It is also paramount to keep in mind that magnetic parameter values, and the relationships between them, fluctuate over time 45 . Finally, we also want to highlight that there may be a need for further investigation not only in the sensitivity of animals to magnetic fields, but in also which components of the field are detectable, and to what extent a detector may be sensitive to discrete x , y and z components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a latitudinal cue without a longitudinal counterpart) would be adequate for philopatry, with magnetic inclination specifically postulated as a possible candidate for such a uni-coordinate ‘stop sign’ mechanism [ 3 , 4 , 11 ]. The use of uni-coordinate information, magnetic or otherwise, is substantially less susceptible to year-on-year (secular) variation in the position denoted by cue values, owing to the potentially multiplicative effects of secular variation in multiple cues [ 16 , 17 ]. However, such a mechanism relies on the presence of an inherited vector to reduce ambiguity caused by multiple sites sharing the same cue value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a highly resolute positioning system would negate any requirement for an inherited programme, birds could in principle use learnt landmarks and spatial gradients to refine a course loosely determined by genetically inherited information [ 3 , 4 ]. In turn, this would reduce any reliance on the resolution at which learnt spatial information is remembered, which could be useful given that inter-annual variations in positions associated with spatial gradient cues can be substantial [ 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%