2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11676-015-0189-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much carbon can the Siberian boreal taiga store: a case study of partitioning among the above-ground and soil pools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In any case, the drought frequency increases in Polar and Siberian landscapes, and further estimates of SOM quality and its stability to mineralization processes should be provided in the near future. The Russian peatlands play a critical role in the formation of global and regional storages of carbon dioxide; thus the organic matter stabilization rates and possible risk of C pools huge losses from soil due to wildfires should be precisely estimated [48][49][50][51]. In this context, the data obtained for the Shatura south-taiga peatlands provide essential information about SOM alteration during the fire effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, the drought frequency increases in Polar and Siberian landscapes, and further estimates of SOM quality and its stability to mineralization processes should be provided in the near future. The Russian peatlands play a critical role in the formation of global and regional storages of carbon dioxide; thus the organic matter stabilization rates and possible risk of C pools huge losses from soil due to wildfires should be precisely estimated [48][49][50][51]. In this context, the data obtained for the Shatura south-taiga peatlands provide essential information about SOM alteration during the fire effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides land management measures, many other factors are known to influence forest carbon density, including climate (Dai et al 2015;Stegen et al 2011), forest age (Guan et al 2015;Zald et al 2016), forest structure (Akers et al 2013;Laganière et al 2015;Lamsal et al 2011), and soil type (Gavrikov et al 2015;Li and Liu 2014;Piao et al 2009). However, relatively few studies have quantified how environmental factors influence forest carbon density (Vieilledent et al 2016;Wen and He 2016) in mountain regions that have a mixture of natural and planted forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such low-fallout forested areas, valuable results may be obtained that elucidate biogeochemical cycle functioning and serve as a basis for erosion monitoring. Also, recordings of levels of 137 Cs activity in landscapes may be integrated into databases of international programs such as EMRAS II (Stocki et al, 2011), MODARIA (IAEA, 2012-2015, BORIS (Tamponnet et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%