2021
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much Daily Image-guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Is Useful for Proctitis Prevention With Respect to Static Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Supported by Topical Medications Among Localized Prostate Cancer Patients?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the first is exclusively devoted to the treatment of brain targets [12], the second is also used for treating extracranial tumors [13]. In recent years, a LINAC-based RT technique-namely Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), which was typically employed for limiting radiationrelated adverse events in extracranial sites [14,15]-has been enhanced with advanced Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) to plan a simultaneous radiation dose delivery to multiple brain metastases with maximal sparing of healthy tissue, similarly to what is achievable with GK [8]. Regarding the therapeutic index, these two stereotactic techniques constantly confront dosimetric challenges, and no clinical study has yet confirmed a clear benefit of the one over the other [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the first is exclusively devoted to the treatment of brain targets [12], the second is also used for treating extracranial tumors [13]. In recent years, a LINAC-based RT technique-namely Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), which was typically employed for limiting radiationrelated adverse events in extracranial sites [14,15]-has been enhanced with advanced Treatment Planning Systems (TPS) to plan a simultaneous radiation dose delivery to multiple brain metastases with maximal sparing of healthy tissue, similarly to what is achievable with GK [8]. Regarding the therapeutic index, these two stereotactic techniques constantly confront dosimetric challenges, and no clinical study has yet confirmed a clear benefit of the one over the other [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, data on RP in an inpatient setting are lacking. As the use of RT continues to increase, physicians are more likely to encounter patients with RP, despite the availability of progressively less toxic radiotherapy techniques [ 11 ]. Therefore, it becomes essential to identify hospitalization characteristics and the disease burden on the US healthcare system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that new drugs and the cutting-edge knowledge of subcellular mechanisms may help to prolong survival even among patients progressing to metastatic stage, the delayed CVD risk is real in an increasingly large LBC patient population [ 5 , 6 ]. The past decades have led to great improvements in radiation delivery techniques to reduce treatment toxicities in challenging tumor sites close to radiosensitive organs at risk (OARs) [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. As regards the treatment of LBCs, the most promising and popular technique is represented by the deep-inspiration-breath-hold (DIBH) irradiation, which uses the lung expansion to displace the heart silhouette from the posterior edge of the tangential radiation fields (TRFs) [ 11 ] or from the mid-high isodose lines in cases of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) use [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%