2017
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much does dry‐season fog matter? Quantifying fog contributions to water balance in a coastal California watershed

Abstract: The seasonally-dry climate of Northern California imposes significant water stress on ecosystems and water resources during the dry summer months. Frequently during summer, the only water inputs occur as non-rainfall water, in the form of fog and dew. However, due to spatially heterogeneous fog interaction within a watershed, estimating fog water fluxes to understand watershed-scale hydrologic effects remains challenging. In this study, we characterized the role of coastal fog, a dominant feature of Northern C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ocean-facing samples were <1.1 km from the Pacific Ocean whereas the bay-facing group were more spread out, located >24 km from the coast, and averaged 3.7 hrs/day summertime FLCC (Table S1). However, while this FLCC frequency is only 60% less than that for the ocean-facing sites, the difference in summertime fog wet deposition is likely to be at least an order of magnitude, with ocean-facing sites being wetter 21,22 .
Figure 1Geographical distributions in the Santa Cruz Mountain coastal region, California, USA, and mean (±1 SE) values by coastal sub-region of ( A ) MMHg concentrations in lace lichen ( Ramalina menziesii ) (site names correspond to data in Table S1), ( B ) THg in adult deer fur, and ( C ) THg in adult puma fur and fur-normalized whisker samples. The blue line represents the watershed boundary which was used to delineate samples as belonging to either the ocean facing (to the left of the line) or bay facing (to the right of the line) sub-regions.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Ocean-facing samples were <1.1 km from the Pacific Ocean whereas the bay-facing group were more spread out, located >24 km from the coast, and averaged 3.7 hrs/day summertime FLCC (Table S1). However, while this FLCC frequency is only 60% less than that for the ocean-facing sites, the difference in summertime fog wet deposition is likely to be at least an order of magnitude, with ocean-facing sites being wetter 21,22 .
Figure 1Geographical distributions in the Santa Cruz Mountain coastal region, California, USA, and mean (±1 SE) values by coastal sub-region of ( A ) MMHg concentrations in lace lichen ( Ramalina menziesii ) (site names correspond to data in Table S1), ( B ) THg in adult deer fur, and ( C ) THg in adult puma fur and fur-normalized whisker samples. The blue line represents the watershed boundary which was used to delineate samples as belonging to either the ocean facing (to the left of the line) or bay facing (to the right of the line) sub-regions.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…During the months between May and September, coastal locations and ocean-facing ridges are particularly impacted by marine stratus clouds with midday overcast occurring on about 50% of the days 21 . The elevation band between 400 and 500 m experiences the greatest amount of summertime wet deposition 22 . The east side of the range which faces the southern San Francisco Bay receives significantly less marine layer influence and fog drip, even though the wintertime precipitation rates on both sides of the range are similar at locations with similar elevation 21 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fog induced decrease in VPD reduces evaporative demand, which leads to reduced plant ET. In a San Francisco peninsula watershed, FLCC reduced ET by 25% (Chung et al 2017), in a coastal Atlantic laurel forest by 30% (Ritter et al 2009), and under multi-year drought conditions, the rate could be higher still (Williams et al 2018). Reduced LW reduces ET leaving more water in the subsurface, with the potential for enhanced recharge and baseflow.…”
Section: Hydroclimate Impacts From Fog and Low Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%