2015
DOI: 10.1111/padm.12205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How ‘Natives’ Work: Political Judgement and Cohesion Through Ritual Interaction Among Ministers

Abstract: How do political administrations sustain whatever kinds of cohesion they do, over their time in office? Although recent research emphasizes institutions, sometimes institutions also weaken cohesion. Informal institutions are more important than formal ones in shaping styles of political judgement in governing administrations. But how can institutional processes explain both weakening and strengthening? This article develops a neo‐Durkheimian theory. It proposes that informal institutions should be understood a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work of Goffman (1967) establishes the role of apparently minor quotidian rituals in sustaining much wider social or political commitments. Former British prime minister Harold Wilson spent considerable effort in deciding on the seating plan for cabinet meetings (6, Perri 2016), appreciating that the success or failure of larger arguments might flow from a judicious positioning of debaters within an order of ritual interaction (Collins 2004). That which is well-ordered in the microcosm is a basis for achieving order in larger social contexts, as Mary Douglas convincingly argues in relation to food and hospitality (Douglas 1982).…”
Section: The Kamajei Ebola Task Force Committeementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Goffman (1967) establishes the role of apparently minor quotidian rituals in sustaining much wider social or political commitments. Former British prime minister Harold Wilson spent considerable effort in deciding on the seating plan for cabinet meetings (6, Perri 2016), appreciating that the success or failure of larger arguments might flow from a judicious positioning of debaters within an order of ritual interaction (Collins 2004). That which is well-ordered in the microcosm is a basis for achieving order in larger social contexts, as Mary Douglas convincingly argues in relation to food and hospitality (Douglas 1982).…”
Section: The Kamajei Ebola Task Force Committeementioning
confidence: 99%