2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03000.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Not to Be Seen — Object Removal from Videos of Crowded Scenes

Abstract: Figure 1: To remove the foremost person from this video, both the dynamic scene elements and the background behind it need to be restored. In this sample from our Museum sequence, the right-hand-side of each frame pair shows the inpainted result. AbstractRemoving dynamic objects from videos is an extremely challenging problem that even visual effects professionals often solve with time-consuming manual frame-by-frame editing. We propose a new approach to video completion that can deal with complex scenes conta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, these methods can be used for visual privacy to remove people that do not commit suspicious activities from video surveillance recordings, removing inactive participants from the video stream of a video conference, concealing people from images in online social networks, and so many other applications. However, due to computational restrictions, inpainting methods are rarely used in real-time applications running on commodity hardware (Granados et al, 2012).…”
Section: Object / People Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these methods can be used for visual privacy to remove people that do not commit suspicious activities from video surveillance recordings, removing inactive participants from the video stream of a video conference, concealing people from images in online social networks, and so many other applications. However, due to computational restrictions, inpainting methods are rarely used in real-time applications running on commodity hardware (Granados et al, 2012).…”
Section: Object / People Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments focus on frame pairs taken from three sequences: MPI S1 [14], Hope and Newspaper. For the selected pairs, the combinatorial multi-step integration has been performed taking input elementary flow fields estimated with a 2D version of the disparity estimator of [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3: Source frames of the MPI S1 sequence [14] and reconstruction of the kiosk of I 46 from I 25 with: 1) the statistical processing (SP), 2) the global optimization (GO) method solved by fusion moves [15], 3) both combined (SP+GO).…”
Section: Combinatorial Multi-step Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiments focus on the following sequences: MPI S1 (Granados et al, 2012) Fig.4 and 6a-h, Hope Fig.6i-p, Newspaper Fig.6q-t, Walking Couple Fig.7 and Flag (Garg et al, 2013) Fig.8. The proposed statistical multi-step flow is referred to as StatFlow in the following.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• direct estimation between each pair {I re f , I n } using LDOF (Brox and Malik, 2011), ITV-L1 ) and the keypoint-based nonrigid registration of (Pizarro and Bartoli, 2012), • concatenation of optical flows computed between consecutive frames using LDOF (LDOF acc), : Source frames of the MPI S1 sequence (Granados et al, 2012) and reconstruction of the kiosk of I 25 from I 45 with: e) the combinatorial integration and the statistical selection introduced in (Conze et al, 2013), f) the proposed extended version described in Section 2.1 (initial phase of StatFlow). Black boxes focus on differences between both methods.…”
Section: Comparisons With Flag Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%