How People Evaluate Online Reviews

Abstract

The ability viewers have to contribute information to websites (i.e., user-generated content) is a defining feature of the participatory web. Building on warranting theory, this study examined how viewers' evaluations of a target are more or less likely to be influenced by user-generated content. The results indicate that the more a target is perceived to be able to control the dissemination of user-generated reviews online, the less credence people place in those reviews when forming impressions of the target. In addition, the less people are confident that user-generated reviews are truly produced by third-party reviewers, the less people trust those reviews. The results provide novel support for warranting theory by illustrating how the warranting value of user-generated information can vary and thus differentially affect viewers' evaluations of a target. The implications of the study's results for warranting theory, online impression management, e-commerce, and future research are discussed.

Selective Self-Presentation and Social Comparison Through Photographs on Social Networking Sites

“…Users will continue to capitalize on the affordances of computermediated communication to achieve their impression management and relationship goals. 11,15,16,65 Our findings demonstrate, however, that existing cultural norms do not necessarily dissipate or diverge in these environments. Researchers must continue to probe how evolving technologies are shifting or replicating our experiences with media regarding our self-image.…”

Social media and credibility indicators: The effect of influence cues

“…Flanagin & Metzger, 2008, 2013. There is ample evidence that people utilize networks of peers and social computing applications for credibility evaluations, such as recommendation agents on Amazon or eBay; regardless of individual opinions regarding a product, people may be more reliant on collective comments and testimonials for purchase decision making (Flanagin & Metzger, 2008DeAndrea, Van Der Heide, Vendemia, & Vang, 2015;Van Der Heide & Lim, 2015). Studies by Sundar and Nass (2001) and Hastall (2007a, 2007b) identified bandwagon heuristics as the most powerful cognitive shortcuts for evaluating online news, with the results that the news stories selected by other users received the highest ratings.…”

Evaluation of Credibility for Reviewers and Review Scores Based on Link Analysis

“…They also considered the difference between the cases that the reviewer's identity is disclosed and not disclosed. Mackiewicz [5] and DeAndrea [6] discussed how users construct reviewers' credibility and how to identify credible reviewers who are likely to influence site users. Chakraborty [7] considered the impact of credible online reviews and relationship with brand images.…”