2017
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1271970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How people organise cultural attitudes: cultural belief systems and the populist radical right

Abstract: Political scientists generally agree that all individuals structure their cultural attitudes in the same unidimensional fashion. However, various populist radical right parties remarkably combine moral progressiveness with conservatism regarding immigration-related issues. This suggests that the structuring of cultural attitudes among the electorate may also be more complex than typically assumed. Applying Correlational Class Analysis to representative survey data, the study uncovers three cultural belief syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
43
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have shown, however, not all parties fit this pattern (e.g., UKIP and the Finns Party), and the determinants of this variation merit further study. Finally, our findings are also in line with recent research that has called for disaggregation of the socio-cultural ideological dimension into different components (Kitschelt, 2012;Daenekindt, de Koster, & van der Waal, 2017). Regardless of how different policy items are correlated at the national level, our findings suggest that we need to distinguish between voter preferences on different non-economic issues when analysing the representativeness of the populist radical right.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As we have shown, however, not all parties fit this pattern (e.g., UKIP and the Finns Party), and the determinants of this variation merit further study. Finally, our findings are also in line with recent research that has called for disaggregation of the socio-cultural ideological dimension into different components (Kitschelt, 2012;Daenekindt, de Koster, & van der Waal, 2017). Regardless of how different policy items are correlated at the national level, our findings suggest that we need to distinguish between voter preferences on different non-economic issues when analysing the representativeness of the populist radical right.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Because the difference between the understandings consists of the position of the item for social exclusion with regard to the other items, I interpret the clusters by examining the bivariate correlations between the included items. This approach is in line with previous studies (e.g., Boutyline, 2017;Daenekindt, 2017;Daenekindt et al, 2017;Goldberg, 2011). Figure 2 [ Figure 2 about here]…”
Section: Four Distinct Understandings Of Social Exclusionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our finding that views on free trade currently play a largely independent electoral role suggests that support for protectionism among the electorate is politicised and shaped by cues from populist party elites. As such, their emphasis on opposition to trade openness is an additional aspect of the way in which their agenda-setting weighs on the political field (compare Daenekindt et al, 2017 ; Minkenberg, 2001 ).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%