2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How population dynamics change in presence of migratory prey and predator's preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If predators feed upon both susceptible prey (S) and infected prey (I) of a single species, then selectivity or preference of the predators to susceptible and infected preys plays significant role in the system dynamics (Hall et al, 2005). In this case, the traditional type II response function should be replaced by multiple-prey type II, which can be mathematically represented by nS/(a + S + uI) and unI/(a + S + uI) for susceptible and infected preys, respectively (Case, 2000;Hall et al, 2005;Flake et al, 2003;Chatterjee et al, 2012). The parameter u measures the selectivity/preference of the predator to infected prey over the susceptible one or vice-versa.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If predators feed upon both susceptible prey (S) and infected prey (I) of a single species, then selectivity or preference of the predators to susceptible and infected preys plays significant role in the system dynamics (Hall et al, 2005). In this case, the traditional type II response function should be replaced by multiple-prey type II, which can be mathematically represented by nS/(a + S + uI) and unI/(a + S + uI) for susceptible and infected preys, respectively (Case, 2000;Hall et al, 2005;Flake et al, 2003;Chatterjee et al, 2012). The parameter u measures the selectivity/preference of the predator to infected prey over the susceptible one or vice-versa.…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is a well-known fact that infected prey individuals become easy to catch by the predator. This property has been considered in a various number of eco-epidemiological models [18,20,23,24,29,51]. In our model, we have considered that the predator consumes infected prey only to control the disease [52,53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In deterministic models, parameters are all deterministic irrespective of environmental fluctuation and hence it is very difficult to predict the future dynamics of the system correctly [25]. Therefore, many authors introduced randomness in deterministic models to reveal the effect of environmental variability [25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If predators feed upon both susceptible rabbit (S) and infected rabbit (I) of a single species, then selectivity or preference of the predators to susceptible and infected preys plays significant role in the system dynamics [23]. In this case traditional type II functional response should be replaced by multiple-prey type II, which can be mathematically represented by ω 1 S/(S + b 1 I + c 1 ) and ω 2 S/(S + b 1 I + c 1 ) for susceptible and infected rabbits, respectively [3,9,12]. The parameter b 1 measures the selectivity/preference of the predator to infected rabbit over the susceptible one or vice-versa.…”
Section: Model Development: the Eco-epidemiological Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%