2020
DOI: 10.22331/q-2020-03-02-238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How post-selection affects device-independent claims under the fair sampling assumption

Abstract: Device-independent certifications employ Bell tests to guarantee the proper functioning of an apparatus from the sole knowledge of observed measurement statistics, i.e. without assumptions on the internal functioning of the devices. When these Bell tests are implemented with lossy devices, one has to post-select the events that lead to successful detections and thus rely on a fair sampling assumption. The question that we address in this paper is what remains of a device-independent certification under fair sa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(102 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the FGS inequality still exhibits the sensitivity to witness the Bell diagonal states. More importantly, the fair sampling condition in steering inequalities needs to be invoked only on the untrusted subsystem [39], the detection efficiency in the measurement setting is required only to be 50% to close the detection loophole [40,41] (the detection efficiency is about 62% in our experiment). Compared to the fully device-independent protocol of an analog of the Bell-CHSH-type steering inequalities, in which the detection efficiency required is up to 83% [42], our approach needs less detector efficiency to certificate the steerablity of mixed states.…”
Section: Experimental Demonstration and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the FGS inequality still exhibits the sensitivity to witness the Bell diagonal states. More importantly, the fair sampling condition in steering inequalities needs to be invoked only on the untrusted subsystem [39], the detection efficiency in the measurement setting is required only to be 50% to close the detection loophole [40,41] (the detection efficiency is about 62% in our experiment). Compared to the fully device-independent protocol of an analog of the Bell-CHSH-type steering inequalities, in which the detection efficiency required is up to 83% [42], our approach needs less detector efficiency to certificate the steerablity of mixed states.…”
Section: Experimental Demonstration and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A way to circumvent this difficulty is to introduce some minimal well-justified assumptions on the internal function of the detectors, which greatly simplifies the detection of GME states in practice but keeps some of the robusteness proper to the fully DI approach. In particular, this can be achieved with the help of the fair-sampling type assumptions [49,50]. A measurement device satisfies the weak fair-sampling assumption [49], if the process responsible for the occurrence of no-click events is independent of the choice of the measurement setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this can be achieved with the help of the fair-sampling type assumptions [49,50]. A measurement device satisfies the weak fair-sampling assumption [49], if the process responsible for the occurrence of no-click events is independent of the choice of the measurement setting. For our purpose this can be formalized in two equivalent ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations