How power affects moral judgments: The role of intuitive thinking

Abstract

Power affects how people think about moral issues, and has been found to elicit deontological moral judgments. We hypothesized that powerholders' propensity to rely on intuitive thinking would trigger deontological moral choices. In two studies, power was induced by role simulation tasks and participants then made a judgment on a moral dilemma that did not involve bodily harm. In Study 1 memory cognitive load was manipulated to induce an intuitive processing style, and in Study 2 deliberation was induced by asking participants to deliver strong arguments. Results of Study 1 show that high power led to deontological judgments regardless of cognitive load, and cognitive load enhanced deontological preferences among powerless individuals. In Study 2 we found that deliberation shifted the judgments of powerholders toward utilitarianism. These results extend prior findings and reinforce the links between power and deontology. The findings suggest that powerholders' preference for deontological moral judgments is driven by their reliance on intuitive thinking.

Moral decision making is robust to physical fatigue: a Process Dissociation analysis

“…Conflicting evidence emerges from studies focused on fatigue-utilitarianism relationship. Experimentally induced fatigue led to a greater aversion towards the utilitarian choices (Timmons & Byrne, 2019), while long-term, environmentally-induced fatigue led to a greater preference towards the utilitarian choices (Zheng et al, 2023).…”