2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How principal leadership and person-job fit are associated with teacher mobility and attrition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
59
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The extent to which principals emphasize fit, or how well an applicant is compatible with the organization, group, or job, is an important consideration of principals' preferences. Studies show principals look for fit in dynamic ways, often preferring applicants who match the norms and values of the school or those familiar with the school and neighborhood context (Cannata & Engel, 2012;Ingle et al, 2011;Perrone & Eddy-Spicer, 2019;Player et al, 2017). Studies suggest these preferences for environmental fit are logical given evidence indicating that local familiarity may increase job embeddedness and minimize possibilities of teacher departure (Engel & Cannata, 2015).…”
Section: Hiring Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extent to which principals emphasize fit, or how well an applicant is compatible with the organization, group, or job, is an important consideration of principals' preferences. Studies show principals look for fit in dynamic ways, often preferring applicants who match the norms and values of the school or those familiar with the school and neighborhood context (Cannata & Engel, 2012;Ingle et al, 2011;Perrone & Eddy-Spicer, 2019;Player et al, 2017). Studies suggest these preferences for environmental fit are logical given evidence indicating that local familiarity may increase job embeddedness and minimize possibilities of teacher departure (Engel & Cannata, 2015).…”
Section: Hiring Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Situating sensemaking within particular school contexts, and especially those at the margins, highlights a critical turn to Weick's (1995) sensemaking framework to include the contextual and structural factors that may enable or constrain how sensemaking is enacted (Mills et al, 2010). Indeed, the uneven and inequitable impact of teacher shortages in some school contexts has prompted stronger emphasis on context-specific approaches to hiring that more accurately help school leaders make sense of which new hires are good matches for the organization (Harris et al, 2010;Player et al, 2017). To further conceptualize organizational match, I discuss notions of fit as intricately connected to sensemaking in the hiring processes.…”
Section: Sensemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research supports the notion that authentic relationships with peers and supervisors reduce turnover and inure early-career teachers in otherwise challenging work environments (Lau et. al., 2007;Player, Youngs, Perrone, & Grogan, 2017;Weiqi, C., 2007).…”
Section: The Positionality: Leadership and Motivation Theory: Hr Beyomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some studies that have found no impact of compensation on retention (e.g., Cowen & Winters, 2013;Hancock & Scherff, 2010), but salary is generally considered to be an important factor influencing teacher recruitment and retention. In addition, a large number of non-monetary factors have been found to influence teacher recruitment and retention, such as professional development (e.g., Elfers, Plecki, & Knapp, 2006;Ingersoll & May, 2012), administrator support (e.g., Ado, 2013;Cannata, 2010), class size (e.g., Horng, 2009;Lankford et al, 2002), student demographic factors (e.g., Feng, 2010;Guarino, Brown, & Wyse, 2011), organizational fit (e.g., Cannata, 2010;Player, Youngs, Perrone, & Grogan, 2017), curricular autonomy (e.g., Bunn & Wake, 2015;Ingersoll & May, 2012), and others.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%