2008
DOI: 10.1177/0037768608089733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Secularized is Germany? Cohort and Comparative Perspectives

Abstract: The author seeks to answer the question ``How secularized is Germany?'' on the basis of different perspectives and databases. The meaning of the term secularization is limited for this study to the decline of religiosity and its consequences, and a distinction is made between church-related and individual religiosity. First, evidence for the decline of church-related religiosity in Germany is presented. Next, it is shown that individual religiosity, i.e. religiosity not necessarily related to organized religio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Those who answered that they went to church once a month or more often were considered religious (1), others were considered nonreligious (0). Although this measurement does not perfectly reflect a person's church attendance during his or her socialization period, we consider it a valid approximation of a respondent's religiosity also in earlier years, assuming that religiosity is relatively stable over the life course (Crockett & Voas, 2006;Te Grotenhuis, De Graaf, & Peters, 1997;Voas, 2009;Voas & Crockett, 2005;Wolf, 2008). 5 Finally, to determine immigrant status, it was only possible to check whether a respondent was born in the country in which the survey was held.…”
Section: Individual Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who answered that they went to church once a month or more often were considered religious (1), others were considered nonreligious (0). Although this measurement does not perfectly reflect a person's church attendance during his or her socialization period, we consider it a valid approximation of a respondent's religiosity also in earlier years, assuming that religiosity is relatively stable over the life course (Crockett & Voas, 2006;Te Grotenhuis, De Graaf, & Peters, 1997;Voas, 2009;Voas & Crockett, 2005;Wolf, 2008). 5 Finally, to determine immigrant status, it was only possible to check whether a respondent was born in the country in which the survey was held.…”
Section: Individual Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger adults are more likely to switch religious affiliation than older adults according to empirical studies from Europe and the United States (e.g. Crockett and Voas 2006;Wolf 2008). This decreasing propensity to religious switching over the course of life may be related to the increasing cost in human capital involved by such change, the cost being greater for individuals who invested more in religion, notably through regular religious practice (Iannaccone 1990).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auch in Folge der vor allem in den 1960er und -70er-Jahren teils vehement vorgebrachten Kritik an kirchensoziologischer Forschung konzentrieren sich soziologische Analysen theoretischer und empirischer Art seither entweder auf die Makroebene des Religionssystems -prominente Ansätze sind hier beispielsweise Säkularisierungs-theoreme (u. a. Goldstein 2009;Wolf 2008) und Markttheorien (u. a. Blasi 2009Innaccone 1992) -oder auf seine Mikroebene, etwa auf die Individualisierung religiöser Handlungsformate (u. a. Gebhardt et al 2005).…”
Section: Kirchliche Sozialformen Als Mehr-ebenen-systemeunclassified