2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.10.054004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Small-World Interactions Can Lead to Improved Quantum Annealer Designs

Abstract: There are many factors that influence the design of quantum annealing processing units. Here we address the issue of improving quantum annealing processing unit designs from the point of view of the critical behavior of spin glasses. It has been argued [Phys. Rev. X 4, 021008 (2014)] that among the most difficult Ising spin-glass ground-state problems are those related to lattices which exhibit a finite-temperature spin-glass transition. Here, we show that adding small-world couplers between qubits (spins) to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of embedding overhead sketched here motivates recent efforts to improve the performance of physical annealers with alternate embedding strategies 33 or increased hardware connectivity. [34][35][36] Quantum annealing offers the promise of quantum speedup, but this must be balanced against the overhead required to embed the problem into the annealer's hardware. As we have shown, this embedding overhead can cause exponential slow-down for general Ising problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of embedding overhead sketched here motivates recent efforts to improve the performance of physical annealers with alternate embedding strategies 33 or increased hardware connectivity. [34][35][36] Quantum annealing offers the promise of quantum speedup, but this must be balanced against the overhead required to embed the problem into the annealer's hardware. As we have shown, this embedding overhead can cause exponential slow-down for general Ising problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assumption-Bespoke QA hardware. Qubit connectivity significantly impacts performance, with sparse connectivity negatively affecting dense problem graphs due to problem mapping difficulties [35], but recent advances in QA have bolstered qubit connectivity [18] while further improvement efforts continue [37,45] and so we assume that these efforts will allow QA hardware tailored to the problem of interest. Roadmap.…”
Section: Qpu Access Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the only known case of speedup is a constant speedup for a class of synthetic problems [29] and, so far, there is no evidence of speedup for an industrial application. The hope is that future improvements to the quantum annealer and, in particular, to its currently sparse connectivity and low precision due to analog noise, will demonstrate the power of quantum effects in solving optimization problems [32,33]. With the same goal in mind, researchers have been inspired to push the envelope for such problems on novel hardware, such as the coherent Ising machine [32], as well as on graphics processing units (GPU) [27,28] and application-specific CMOS hardware [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%