How strategic environmental assessment can inform lenders about potential environmental risks

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the potential for Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to be a useful tool for banks to manage environmental risks and inform lending decisions. SEA is an environmental assessment tool that was developed to assist strategic-level decision-makers, such as policy-makers, planners, government authorities and environmental practitioners in improving developmental outcomes, aiming to facilitate the transition to sustainable development. We propose that SEA may also be a valuable tool for banks because it has the capacity to provide information about environmental risks at a time when it can be used as an input to bank lending decisions, which can assist banks in making lending decisions with better environmental outcomes. For these reasons, we argue that in some circumstances, and particularly for project finance transactions, SEA may be a more useful environmental assessment tool for lenders than EIA, which many banks are currently relying on to help assess and mitigate environmental risks. Further we suggest that the use of SEA by banks would contribute to the sustainability goals of SEA.

Seven Approaches to Manage Complex Coupled Human and Natural Systems: A Sustainability Toolbox

“…In these kinds of applications, sustainable governance usually begins with an accounting of environmental impacts (e.g., ecological footprint analysis, energy analysis, or environmental impact cost-benefit analysis), and then identifies the actions for impact mitigation. For instance, banks use environmental impact assessment to measure a project’s environmental risk and then use this information as an input for bank lending decisions . Businesses use these tools to protect the environment and to develop business strategies that will ensure their survival …”

“…For instance, banks use environmental impact assessment to measure a project's environmental risk and then use this information as an input for bank lending decisions. 84 Businesses use these tools to protect the environment and to develop business strategies that will ensure their survival. 85 For national and local governments and nongovernmental organizations, governance tools appear as policy, management, and legislation instruments whose objectives are to increase sustainable behaviors of individuals and organizations.…”

Does the integration of enviromental impact assessment and mine closure planning deliver effective mine closure plans in Western Australia?

“…Early mine closure planning is important to minimise the environmental, financial, social and legal liabilities of mine closure, and these liabilities are an important consideration for potential financiers at the project approval stage (Sweeting & Clark 2000;Banhalmi-Zakar & Larsen 2015). The early inclusion of mine closure planning was described during the interviews as fundamental to the effectiveness of early MCP through the early identification of risks and fatal flaws to guide decision-making, obtaining closure data that may otherwise be lost, and ensure efficient mine planning that considers closure requirements.…”

Evolution or revolution: where next for impact assessment?

“…The role of non-governmental players, such as funding agencies and financiers, and civil 'watchdog' organisations' as quasi-regulators of development through IA is growing (Banhalmi-Zakar and Larsen 2016;Vanclay 2015). Imbedding the concepts of ecological and social resilience have emerged as a key challenge over recent years, adding another layer of complexity to IA, requiring practitioners to recognise nonlinearity, feedback loops, and stochasticity (Wenning et al 2017).…”