2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How temporal and spatial aspects of presenting visualizations affect learning about locomotion patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This replicates the findings of Khot and colleagues that computer-based resources were not more effective than traditional models for the self-study of pelvic anatomy (Khot et al, 2013). These findings are also consistent with previous studies (Hegarty et al, 2003 [study 3];Mayer et al, 2005;Schneider, 2007;Boucheix and Schneider, 2009;Imhof et al, 2012) suggesting that dynamic visualizations are not the only way to effectively convey complex and dynamic information, and that particular spatial layouts (Imhof et al, 2012) may be as efficient. Indeed, the static condition in this study combined two effective spatial layouts.…”
Section: Do Dynamic 3d Visualizations Support Learning Functional Anasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This replicates the findings of Khot and colleagues that computer-based resources were not more effective than traditional models for the self-study of pelvic anatomy (Khot et al, 2013). These findings are also consistent with previous studies (Hegarty et al, 2003 [study 3];Mayer et al, 2005;Schneider, 2007;Boucheix and Schneider, 2009;Imhof et al, 2012) suggesting that dynamic visualizations are not the only way to effectively convey complex and dynamic information, and that particular spatial layouts (Imhof et al, 2012) may be as efficient. Indeed, the static condition in this study combined two effective spatial layouts.…”
Section: Do Dynamic 3d Visualizations Support Learning Functional Anasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the instructional video was found to be adapted to participants' cognitive resources and was not too long or complex to become subject to negative effects of information transience. These findings are in contrast to some researches [24][25][26] reporting that dynamic visualizations do not outperform a static-simultaneous presentation of multiple pictures, which suggests that instructional superiority of videos is only limited to contents that involve acquisition of human motor skills [13]. Finally, it should be noted that superiority of instructional video over static pictures could be extended to an ecological (non-laboratory) learning task combining model observation and practice (i.e., re-enacting the movements that have just been observed).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For a locomotion pattern classification task, Imhof et al [25] indicated that learning from statics-simultaneous visualizations was more beneficial than learning from statics-sequential visualizations. To explain the contradictory findings Imhof et al [26] stated that whereas static-sequential visualizations are more appropriate to depict the order of separate states or phases, static-simultaneous visualizations may be more appropriate for tasks involving continuous movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment was realized in association with international multidisciplinary project (including biological as well as cognitive and educational aspects) related to expert and novice fish locomotion classification and recognition (Gerjets, Imhof, Kühl, Pfeiffer, Scheiter, & Gemballa, 2010;Imhof, Scheiter, Edelmann, & Gerjets, 2012;Imhof, Scheiter, & Gerjets, 2011;Jarodzka, Scheiter, Gerjets, & van Gog, 2010;Kühl, Scheiter, Gerjets, & Gemballa, 2011, see the acknowledgment). The overall design of the experiment was composed of a short learning-studying phase, followed by a post-test which assessed the effect of the learning-studying session.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%