2023
DOI: 10.34190/iccws.18.1.985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the Russian Influence Operation on Twitter Weaponized Military Narratives

Abstract: Since 2016, Russia has engaged in a dedicated influence operation against the United States to exacerbate existing cleavages in American society and to undermine US national security. Although distinctly modern in its use of social media platforms, the current methods align with old Soviet doctrine using information warfare to gain a strategic edge over competitors. We examine Russia’s use of military-related content and profiles in their influence operation on Twitter and, in particular, the strategic deploym… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This encompassed attacks on communication systems, government websites, border control stations, and Ukraine's digital infrastructure (Przetacznik and Tarpova, 2022). Additionally, Russia employed various tactics, including the manipulation of information through social media, fabricating American military profiles on Twitter to exploit anti-government sentiments and sway populations toward pro-Russian stances (Littell and Starck, 2023;Weinberg, Dawson and Edwards 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This encompassed attacks on communication systems, government websites, border control stations, and Ukraine's digital infrastructure (Przetacznik and Tarpova, 2022). Additionally, Russia employed various tactics, including the manipulation of information through social media, fabricating American military profiles on Twitter to exploit anti-government sentiments and sway populations toward pro-Russian stances (Littell and Starck, 2023;Weinberg, Dawson and Edwards 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%