2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to account for operating condition variability when predicting liner operating life with DEM – A case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers studied that the DEM simulation of mill behavior was only a weak variation with the mechanical properties [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. To dramatically accelerate the computational efficiency of DEM simulations, the reduction in shear modulus was commonly employed without changing the charge behavior [ 15 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers studied that the DEM simulation of mill behavior was only a weak variation with the mechanical properties [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. To dramatically accelerate the computational efficiency of DEM simulations, the reduction in shear modulus was commonly employed without changing the charge behavior [ 15 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wear damage on the structural boundary ∑ O by the particle contact is generally considered to be proportional to the energy it absorbs from the collisions 12 . Since both the impact and abrasive mechanisms can induce the removal of material from the structural boundary ∑ O , the wear volume V i d (mm 3 ) of structural boundary ∑ O at a boundary element i for a period of τ d can be expressed as 10 : Vid=aImpactifalse∑m=1Nifalse∑c=1Ni,mEImpacti,m+aitalicAbrasionifalse∑m=1Nifalse∑c=1Ni,mEitalicAbrasioni,mWi where c is the serial number of the contact between boundary element i and particle m within the τ d ; N i , m is the total number of contacts; N i is the total number of the particles that were in contact with boundary element i within the τ d ; a i Impact and a i Abrasion are the weight factors (dimensionless) of the accumulated collision energies m=1Nic=1italicNcEImpacti,m and m=1Nic=1italicNcEitalicAbrasioni,m (J), respectively; W i is the wear rate (mm 3 /J).…”
Section: Wear Prediction For Structural Boundary and Treatment Of Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wear prediction based on the DEM, a life cycle simulation of wear evolution 11 is performed through a series of evolution steps, in which the wear data from collisions are first collected, and then the geometry of structural boundary is modified progressively in response to wear. Generally, the structural boundary subjected to wear is composed of a number of smaller boundary elements, such as triangular meshes 10,12 . As a result, the wear contributions to the local boundaries by the particle contacts can be collected via these boundary elements in the DEM simulation, 13 and the new wear distributions on the local boundaries can be described by changing the positions of these boundary elements individually 11 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…css is the distance between bowl liner and the mantle at the CSS. Then compression ratio can be calculated according to (11)- (14). However, the compression ratio may not be equal to the actual compression ratio when the crusher operates in different conditions.…”
Section: Prediction Model Of Liner Wearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material flow form is subjected to operating conditions. Franke [14] explored the liner wear which is caused by different operating conditions. It was found that liner wear is sensitive to the speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%