Teaching Chemistry – A Studybook 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Allocate the Chemistry Curriculum Between Science and Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
108
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
108
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eilks et al (2013) (based on Van Berkel (2005) and De Jong (2006)) described different basic orientations/ approaches that can be found in science curricula. Several of these were partially discussed in the section related to the historical developments of relevance in science education in this review paper.…”
Section: Studies In Science Education 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eilks et al (2013) (based on Van Berkel (2005) and De Jong (2006)) described different basic orientations/ approaches that can be found in science curricula. Several of these were partially discussed in the section related to the historical developments of relevance in science education in this review paper.…”
Section: Studies In Science Education 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These curricula mirrored (in many cases) the point of view of scientists regarding the learning of science. The curricula mainly followed a model using a 'structure-of-thediscipline' approach in order to promote a more effective learning of science facts, concepts and theories (Eilks, Rauch, Ralle, & Hofstein, 2013). In the context of this approach, basic concepts and the structure of each discipline were chosen as the focal points of the curriculum.…”
Section: The Late 1950s and Early 1960smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, I would claim that the rationalist-objectivist focus is still common in much science teaching around the globe. It is typically characterized by a predominantly transmissive view focused on content learning and the structure of the discipline (Eilks, Rauch, Ralle, and Hofstein 2013). In the science education literature it has been quite rare with publications that thoroughly discuss science education in relation to critical pedagogy and/or transformative learning (one exception is: Carter, Rodriguez, and Jones 2014).…”
Section: Science Teachers' Educational Philosophies and Different Vismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eilks, Rauch, Ralle, and Hofstein (2013) have described a range of curriculum approaches in chemistry education from fundamental (disciplinary-oriented), via context-based and CTS (Chemistry-Technology-Society), towards SSI and sustainability driven curricula. Similarly, Erminia Pedretti and Joanne Nazir (2011) have discussed different orientations of STSE education-from application-oriented to sociocultural-oriented to socio-ecojustice-oriented.…”
Section: Effects On the Praxis Of Science Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These standards and newer frameworks, suggest that the goal for school science is to educate students to experience the richness and excitement of knowing and understanding the natural world and to engage them intelligently in public discourse regarding debate matters of scientific and technological concerns. It is suggested, that chemistry should be taught to prepare students for academic careers in science and engineering, but in the same time to help them becoming informed and responsible citizens in society, e.g., when it comes to political decisions on applications of science in industry (Ware, 2001;Eilks, Rauch, Ralle, & Hofstein 2013). These future citizens will eventually appreciate how science and technology contribute to their daily life as well as to the society in which they live and operate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%