How to analyse ecosystem services in landscapes—A systematic review

Englund, Oskar; Berndes, Göran; Cederberg, Christel

doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.009

Cited by 134 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is defined as "The direct and indirect contributions of ecosystems to human wellbeing" (TEEB 2010). Ecosystem services provide various materials and non-material benefits to human beings (Costanza et al 1997;Nelson et al 2009;Vizzarri et al 2015;Englund et al 2017). These services are grouped into four broad categories of provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting ES.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cultural services are the nonmaterial benefits that human beings are acquired from the ecosystem through aesthetic experience, reflection, recreation, the spiritual enrichment, and knowledge system and education. Supporting services are fundamental to maintain the conditions for life on Earth and include services like soil formation, photosynthesis, and nutrient cycling, and habitats for species (De Groot 2002;MEA 2005;Englund et al 2017). Therefore, the flow of ES is determine the level of human-well beings, which is linked to ecosystem composition and function (Cruz-Garcia et al 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessment of forest ecosystem service research trends and methodological approaches at global level: a meta-analysis

Mengist

Soromessa

2019

Environ Syst Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ecosystem service (ES) is a growing field of research characterized by an increase in publication number. The review was conducted to provide an overview of trends of forest ecosystem services (FES) research and methodological approach to studied FES. Currently, the number of publications on ES was more than 18,000, but small publications were linked with FES. Based on the selection criteria, 41 peer-reviewed publications were screened to analyze the type of FES studied and the method used to quantify ES. The result showed that most of the research articles, to date, had focused largely on provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services, which were timber production, water supply, carbon sequestration, and recreation. FES like a pollination, genetic resources, pest regulation, and aesthetic values have not been studied in any literature reviews. The review result showed that different studies used diverse methodological approaches and had inconsistent and scattered conclusions. From the selected studies, the majority of them were conducted in Europe and Asia. Particularly, the publication number from Ethiopia was very low and needs to conduct studies before the forest resources are further degraded. which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of forest ecosystem service research trends and methodological approaches at global level: a meta-analysis

Mengist

Soromessa

2019

Environ Syst Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Due to its interest to research and policy communities, there has been much debate on certain critical conceptual and operational issues, such as the following: 1) defining the related key terms, such as ecosystem processes, functions vs. services, goods, benefits vs. contributions (Boyd and Banzhaf, 2007;Wallace, 2007;Fisher et al, 2009) 2) classifying ES through international initiatives (TEEB, 2012;CICES, 2018;IPBES, 2018) 3) understanding and representing relations between ES and human well-being (Dominati et al, 2010;Haines-Young and Potschin, 2010;Potschin-Young et al, 2018) 4) developing assessment methods (Jónsson and Davíðsdóttir, 2016;Burkhard and Maes, 2017;Englund et al, 2017) 5) exploring the accessibility and usefulness of the ES concept to better inform territorial planning policies (de Groot et al, 2010;Hatton MacDonald et al, 2014;Ruckelshaus et al, 2015;Albert et al, 2016;Posner et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Framework to Consider Soil Ecosystem Services in Territorial Planning

Fossey

Angers

Bustany

et al. 2020

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In contrast to pollination, pest and enemy biology and the associated impacts on crops can be extremely diverse across regions and systems (Tscharntke et al, 2016). This has restricted the potential to link specific landscape characteristics to enhanced pest suppression (Englund et al, 2017). As a result, efforts to assess natural pest control on the basis of spatially-explicit land-use information have had limited predictive scope (e.g., Rega et al, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of models of natural pest control: toward predictions across agricultural landscapes

Alexandridis

Martin

Marion

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Complexity and context-dependence in ecological and socioecological phenomena often cause inconsistent or seemingly idiosyncratic responses. This apparent lack of generality presents a challenge to the implementation of ecological principles in environmental management. We mostly rely for prediction on data-hungry correlative models that offer little mechanistic understanding. The alternative of process-based modelling is knowledge-intensive and has limited applicability across systems, due to a trade-off between generality and realism. Here, we present an archetype approach, combining trait-mediated mechanistic understanding into ecological models of intermediate generality, as a way to overcome these limitations. We demonstrate its potential in the case of natural pest control across crop-pest-enemy systems. After reviewing the current modelling approaches and their shortcomings, we show that similar responses of natural pest control in cases that share key characteristics indicate the potential for context-sensitive generalizations. Example archetypes show great promise for improved understanding and prediction. We outline how statistical analysis of available data and rule sets for model development will allow systematic definition of archetypes representing the key processes of all major crop-pest-enemy systems of the world. In this and other applied cases, the use of archetype

show abstract

How to analyse ecosystem services in landscapes—A systematic review

Cited by 134 publications

References 58 publications

Assessment of forest ecosystem service research trends and methodological approaches at global level: a meta-analysis

Assessment of forest ecosystem service research trends and methodological approaches at global level: a meta-analysis

A Framework to Consider Soil Ecosystem Services in Territorial Planning

A review of models of natural pest control: toward predictions across agricultural landscapes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About