2009
DOI: 10.1108/17465260910930458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to avoid customers leaving: the case of the Estonian telecommunication industry

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to show that the major factors affecting loyalty are dependant on the level of loyalty of customers.Design/methodology/approachA model of relationship between factors of loyalty and loyalty levels of customers was constructed and tested on the empirical data about 1,000 private customers from the Customer Satisfaction Survey of Elion, the biggest telecommunication company in Estonia. Logit model was used in order to examine which factors influence the probability of the cust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of this study is in line with the theory; the level of customer confidence is measured through the indicators of trust as said by Mitchell in Egan (2004), which includes: probity, equity, and reliability. According to Kuusik et. al (2009), trust is one of the main groups of factors affecting loyalty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this study is in line with the theory; the level of customer confidence is measured through the indicators of trust as said by Mitchell in Egan (2004), which includes: probity, equity, and reliability. According to Kuusik et. al (2009), trust is one of the main groups of factors affecting loyalty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other compensation related variables could also be investigated in terms of their prediction of turnover such as pay equity (Carraher and Carraher, 2005;Fields et al, 2005;Jaques, 1961), organizational justice (McDowall and Fletcher, 2004), fairness (Edgar and Geare, 2005), pay-for-performance perceptions (Chang and Hahn, 2006), pay system changes (Morrell et al, 2004), household or family income rather than personal salary (Adamache and Sloan, 1985;Jones, 1993;Turvey et al, 2009), reasons for working (economic vs non-economic;Carraher et al, 2003a, b), economic conditions, number of levels of organizational hierarchy included in the sample ( Jaques, 1961), and organizational financial instability (Arthaud-day et al, 2006). In regards to consequences, benefits might be useful for influencing individual's general performance (Welsh et al, 1993), hospitality and customer service (Carraher et al, 1998;McBride et al, 1997;Welsh and Swerdlow, 1992), organizational commitment (Kazlauskaite et al, 2006) leadership (Tuulik and Alas, 2009) or other organizationally important behaviors (Vadi and TĂĽrk, 2009) which could retain employees and customers (Carraher, 2006;Carraher and Buckley, 2005;Kuusik and Varblane, 2009)? A fourth area for research could be to examine what other individual level variables might influence the relationship between compensation/benefits and both employee and organizational turnover. Some possible variables to examine include demographic differences within samples such as racial composition, national culture of the sample, and educational attainment; personality, feedback seeking behaviors, and personal orientation towards being innovative (Banzhaf, 2005;Carraher, 1992;Carraher et al, 2006a, b;DuobienÄ— et al, 2007;GustainienÄ— and EndriulaitienÄ—, 2009;Harvey et al, 2009;Lilly et al, 2006;...…”
Section: Discussion Future Research and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst these can reveal contradictory needs and expectations, it also allows a thematic thread to be identified and integrated into CRM strategies. Whilst CRM software can support churn analysis to predict potential leavers (Kuusik and Varblane, 2009) it is also important to recognise the factors of product performance, perceived value, organisational norms, relationship strength and the wider competitive environment that collectively impact the loyalty orientation respective market segments.…”
Section: Managerial Implications and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%