“…Other compensation related variables could also be investigated in terms of their prediction of turnover such as pay equity (Carraher and Carraher, 2005;Fields et al, 2005;Jaques, 1961), organizational justice (McDowall and Fletcher, 2004), fairness (Edgar and Geare, 2005), pay-for-performance perceptions (Chang and Hahn, 2006), pay system changes (Morrell et al, 2004), household or family income rather than personal salary (Adamache and Sloan, 1985;Jones, 1993;Turvey et al, 2009), reasons for working (economic vs non-economic;Carraher et al, 2003a, b), economic conditions, number of levels of organizational hierarchy included in the sample ( Jaques, 1961), and organizational financial instability (Arthaud-day et al, 2006). In regards to consequences, benefits might be useful for influencing individual's general performance (Welsh et al, 1993), hospitality and customer service (Carraher et al, 1998;McBride et al, 1997;Welsh and Swerdlow, 1992), organizational commitment (Kazlauskaite et al, 2006) leadership (Tuulik and Alas, 2009) or other organizationally important behaviors (Vadi and TĂĽrk, 2009) which could retain employees and customers (Carraher, 2006;Carraher and Buckley, 2005;Kuusik and Varblane, 2009)? A fourth area for research could be to examine what other individual level variables might influence the relationship between compensation/benefits and both employee and organizational turnover. Some possible variables to examine include demographic differences within samples such as racial composition, national culture of the sample, and educational attainment; personality, feedback seeking behaviors, and personal orientation towards being innovative (Banzhaf, 2005;Carraher, 1992;Carraher et al, 2006a, b;DuobienÄ— et al, 2007;GustainienÄ— and EndriulaitienÄ—, 2009;Harvey et al, 2009;Lilly et al, 2006;...…”