2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr00718f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to choose a precursor for decomposition solution-phase synthesis: the case of iron nanoparticles

Abstract: The decomposition of organometallic compounds as precursors has revolutionized the synthesis of nanoparticles in solution. However, effective control of size and size distribution of iron nanoparticles has remained challenging due to the high reactivity of iron towards oxygen or oxygen-containing materials. Reported is a decomposition study that shows how metal to ligand bonding and symmetry of the compound can be manipulated to control the size and size distribution of iron nanoparticles in the 6-16 nm range.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other precursors, such as iron bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, Fe[N(Si(CH 3 ) 3 ) 2 ], and iron oleate, have been also used to synthesize iron nanocubes; however, these precursors are either air‐sensitive or require very high reaction temperatures to decompose. Recently, Fe NPs were synthesized by reductive decomposition of the organo‐iron sandwich complex and the decomposition profiles were controlled by the symmetry and metal–ligand bond dissociation energies of the complex ( Figure ). From the investigated precursors, bis(1,3,5‐exo‐6‐tetramethyl‐η 5 ‐cyclohexadienyl)iron, or [Fe(η 5 ‐C 6 H 3 Me 4 ) 2 ], was found to be the best one, with a narrow decomposition temperature range due to its symmetry and the low bond dissociation energy of the ligands from the Fe(II) center.…”
Section: Fe Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other precursors, such as iron bis(trimethylsilyl)amide, Fe[N(Si(CH 3 ) 3 ) 2 ], and iron oleate, have been also used to synthesize iron nanocubes; however, these precursors are either air‐sensitive or require very high reaction temperatures to decompose. Recently, Fe NPs were synthesized by reductive decomposition of the organo‐iron sandwich complex and the decomposition profiles were controlled by the symmetry and metal–ligand bond dissociation energies of the complex ( Figure ). From the investigated precursors, bis(1,3,5‐exo‐6‐tetramethyl‐η 5 ‐cyclohexadienyl)iron, or [Fe(η 5 ‐C 6 H 3 Me 4 ) 2 ], was found to be the best one, with a narrow decomposition temperature range due to its symmetry and the low bond dissociation energy of the ligands from the Fe(II) center.…”
Section: Fe Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple method for synthesizing Fe MNPs is by thermal decomposition of easy to handle iron organometallic precursor, Fe(C 5 H 5 )(C 6 H 7 ), by hot injection or slow reduction with H 2 . [61,63,[85][86][87][88] The low temperature, controllable reduction process has enabled size control between 7-15 nm, and the formation of cubes [61,87] and cluster-conglomerates. [85] The resulting MNPs have Fe(0) cores that has high M Sat and a 2-3 nm oxide shell.…”
Section: Iron Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[92a] In addition to the ratio of precursors and ligands to start with, shape and size of the formed MNPs by thermal decomposition approach are governed by the rate of heating, the final temperature of the reaction and the annealing time. [146] In a study performed by Herman et al, [147] they studied the effect of altering the symmetry and metal-ligand bond dissociation energy of the organometallic precursor on controlling the size and size distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles within a thermal decomposition synthesis. Three iron sandwich compounds having different decomposition profiles where decomposed in 1-octadene solvent in the presence of oleylamine as a capping agent.…”
Section: Thermal Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%