2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-007-1808-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to confirm identified toxicants in effect-directed analysis

Abstract: Due to the production and use of a multitude of chemicals in modern society, waters, sediments, soils and biota may be contaminated with numerous known and unknown chemicals that may cause adverse effects on ecosystems and human health. Effect-directed analysis (EDA), combining biotesting, fractionation and chemical analysis, helps to identify hazardous compounds in complex environmental mixtures. Confirmation of tentatively identified toxicants will help to avoid artefacts and to establish reliable cause-effe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study investigating AhR agonists in indoor dust from electronic waste recycling sites could only explain between 8 and 29 % of the activity by chemical analysis [42]. Other factors that could contribute to this discrepancy, such as matrix effects in the complex mixture and non-additive effects of mixtures of compounds [43,44], have been proposed for lack of coherence between the measured AhR activity and the presence of AhR agonists in complex samples.…”
Section: Particle Fractionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Another study investigating AhR agonists in indoor dust from electronic waste recycling sites could only explain between 8 and 29 % of the activity by chemical analysis [42]. Other factors that could contribute to this discrepancy, such as matrix effects in the complex mixture and non-additive effects of mixtures of compounds [43,44], have been proposed for lack of coherence between the measured AhR activity and the presence of AhR agonists in complex samples.…”
Section: Particle Fractionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Finally, a confirmation step in the EDA procedure evaluates how much of the observed toxicity in the environmental sample can be attributed to the mixture of identified toxicants (Brack 2003). More recent approaches focus on the development of methodologies aiming at the assessment of mixture toxicity accounting for unknown modes of action and heterogeneity of concentration-response curves (Brack et al 2008b). …”
Section: The Eda Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borja and Dauer (2008) describe the four corners of environmental quality assessment as: “(1) assessing ecological integrity, (2) evaluating if significant ecological degradation has occurred, (3) identifying the spatial extent and location of ecological degradation and (4) determining causes of unacceptable degradation in order to guide management actions.” The identification of cause represents a major issue that has been addressed in toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) or in effects evaluation analysis studies. Recent publications by Perron et al (2010), Hecker and Hollert (2009), Schaeffer et al (2009), Brack et al (2008) and Gomez-Gutierrez et al (2007) provide a wealth of references on this aspect of risk assessment and outline the critical role played by chemical analyses. The importance of chemical analyses is also apparent in the work described in a large section of the present manuscript (Section 7).…”
Section: Introduction To Environmental Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%