How to Effectively Control Energy Consumption Growth in China’s 29 Provinces: A Paradigm of Multi-Regional Analysis Based on EAALMDI Method

Abstract

Controlling energy consumption to reduce greenhouse gas emissions has become a global consensus in response to the challenge of climate change. Most studies have focused on energy consumption control in a single region; however, high-resolution analysis of energy consumption and personalized energy policy-making, for multiple regions with differentiated development, have become a complicated challenge. Using the logarithmic mean Divisia index I (LMDI) decomposition method based on energy allocation analysis (EAA), this paper aims to establish a standard paradigm for a high-resolution analysis of multi-regional energy consumption and provide suggestions for energy policy-making, taking 29 provinces of China as the sample. The process involved three steps: (1) determination of regional priorities of energy consumption control by EAA, (2) revealing regional disparity among the driving forces of energy consumption growth by LMDI, and (3) deriving policy implications by comparing the obtained results with existing policies. The results indicated that 29 provinces can be divided into four groups, with different priorities of energy consumption control according to the patterns of coal flows. Most provinces have increasing levels of energy consumption, driven by increasing per capita GDP and improving living standards, while its growth is restrained by decreasing end-use energy intensity, improving energy supply efficiency, and optimization of industrial structures. However, some provinces are not following these trends to the same degree. This indicates that policy-makers must pay more attention to the different driving mechanisms of energy consumption growth among provinces.

A Calculation and Decomposition Method Embedding Sectoral Energy Structure for Embodied Carbon: A Case Study of China’s 28 Sectors

“…As the logic is concise and clear, the division of responsibilities is clear, and the difficulty of data statistics is relatively low, this method is currently the most widely used method of distribution of responsibilities. For example, most of the existing research on direct energy consumption or carbon emissions [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], the official statistics of various countries [20][21][22], and the energy consumption and carbon emissions data released by institutions such as the IEA [23] and the World Bank [24] are all based on the method of producer responsibility. China's "3060" dual-carbon target, as well as key indicators such as energy consumption and carbon emission control targets in the national energy plan [25], are also proposed based on this method.…”

Analysis of Changes in the Aggregate Exergy Efficiency of China’s Energy System from 2005 to 2015

“…Yang et al [50] systematically analyzed the carbon flow in various stages of China's energy systems. Zhao et al [51] provided a deep overview of energy consumption disparities in 29 provinces in China.…”

A Visualization Method of the Economic Input–Output Table: Mapping Monetary Flows in the Form of Sankey Diagrams

“…Sankey diagrams are effective tools for focusing on energy flow and its distribution across various energy systems for various purposes [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Based on the energy data, some researchers mapped energy-related carbon dioxide into Sankey diagrams to trace the carbon elements from energy supply to energy end-use [19,[29][30][31][32][33]. In addition, to analyze the energy flows, the Sankey diagram was developed and expanded to analyze other material flows for various purposes, such as land cover [34], waste [35], iron [36], rare earth elements [37], and water [38,39].…”