2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-013-0996-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to improve agri-environment schemes to achieve meadow bird conservation in Europe? A case study in the Saône valley, France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This considered, agri‐environmental schemes specifically thought to halt the decline of grassland birds and to maintain grassland surface resulted in mixed effects (Broyer, Curtet, & Chazal, ); thus complementary strategies are desirable to address this conservation issue from a different perspective. In the U.S.A., sustainable market‐based conservation models were suggested as the best opportunity to conserve grassland bird populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This considered, agri‐environmental schemes specifically thought to halt the decline of grassland birds and to maintain grassland surface resulted in mixed effects (Broyer, Curtet, & Chazal, ); thus complementary strategies are desirable to address this conservation issue from a different perspective. In the U.S.A., sustainable market‐based conservation models were suggested as the best opportunity to conserve grassland bird populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since nest destruction by farming practices is one of the main causes of the Curlew's decline (Berg 1992a, Valkama & Currie 1999, Brown 2015, postponing grass or crop harvesting represents a good management measure. In France, postponing grass harvesting to either 1 or 15 July increased significantly the number of breeding Curlews over the years (Broyer et al 2014). In addition, a phenological mismatch exists between the nesting time of Curlews and the sowing time of farmers, which exposes nests to destruction (Santangeli et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, expanding conservation interventions to the wider environment is expensive, and AECM budgets are often insufficient to cover areas beyond the Natura 2000 network, or other targeted areas. As a result more funding and targeting of schemes to species and habitats is required to increase the scale and effectiveness of agri-environment schemes sufficiently to achieve landscape and population level improvements (Arponen et al, 2013;Broyer, Curtet and Chazal, 2014 Poláková et al, 2011;Whittingham, 2007).This problem is greatly exacerbated where agricultural development programmes are taking place (such as irrigation schemes), sometimes supported by EU funds, that provide opportunities for landowners to adopt more intensive systems that substantially increase the profitability of their farms. Evidence from case studies in the Drivers of Success study, and numerous other LIFE projects (Brauner, Korbetis and Latruberce, 2017) shows that, where financial incentives are seen as low, AECM schemes are often not taken up, no matter how good the relations with the farming community.…”
Section: The Contribution Of Each Cap Instrument/measure To Bhd Habitats and Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%