2020
DOI: 10.1002/clc.23350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to interpret right ventricular remodeling in athletes

Abstract: Long‐lasting athletic training induces an overload on the heart that leads to structural, functional, and electrical adaptive changes known as the “athlete's heart.” The amount of this heart remodeling has been traditionally considered balanced between the left and the right heart chambers. However, during intense exercise, the right heart is exposed to a disproportional afterload and wall stress which over a long period of time could lead to more pronounced exercise‐induced changes. Highly trained athletes, e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the years, it has been well established that cardiac output (Q) is a major limiting factor for the maximum oxygen uptake (VO 2max ) during exercise (Bassett and Howley, 2000;Stöhr et al, 2011;Lundby et al, 2017).Q equals the product of heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (SV), and is largely determined by a harmonic structural and functional adaption of the heart, where especially cardiac compliance is a prerequisite for large end-diastolic volumes (Levine, 2008;Magder, 2016). If these prerequisites are given, the heart, e.g., the athletic heart-which is characterized by greater dimensions, specifically harmonically increased leftventricular dimensions (Baggish and Wood, 2011;La Sanz-de Garza et al, 2020)-has a greater ability to use the Frank-Starling-mechanism. This well described mechanism allows for an efficient realization of SV due to a preload mediated stretch of the myocardium (Woodiwiss and Norton, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, it has been well established that cardiac output (Q) is a major limiting factor for the maximum oxygen uptake (VO 2max ) during exercise (Bassett and Howley, 2000;Stöhr et al, 2011;Lundby et al, 2017).Q equals the product of heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (SV), and is largely determined by a harmonic structural and functional adaption of the heart, where especially cardiac compliance is a prerequisite for large end-diastolic volumes (Levine, 2008;Magder, 2016). If these prerequisites are given, the heart, e.g., the athletic heart-which is characterized by greater dimensions, specifically harmonically increased leftventricular dimensions (Baggish and Wood, 2011;La Sanz-de Garza et al, 2020)-has a greater ability to use the Frank-Starling-mechanism. This well described mechanism allows for an efficient realization of SV due to a preload mediated stretch of the myocardium (Woodiwiss and Norton, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Martin test, we did not find any significant changes in adBP. However, cardiac output increased, and TPVR, respectively, decreased, which is a physiologically appropriate response of the cardiovascular system to exercise [5,17,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, in highly trained endurance athletes where the RV dilation is prominent, a slight reduction in RV global systolic function assessed by RV FAC may be shown. 30 , 31 On the contrary, resistance training, such as weight lifting and wrestling, may lead to increased cardiac mass without LV chamber dilation, referred to as concentric hypertrophy. 29 In this study, we used untrained animals to understand the influence of innate aerobic capacity on the cardiovascular system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%