2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-6016(00)00038-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to keep good schemata using cross-over operators for permutation problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children are generated by exchanging parents' strings. However, in BCP the only difference between an individual and another is the order in which the elements of the chromosome are permuted, and in most cases it makes no sense to talk of pure recombination (Djerid & Portmann, 2000), since the association of different parents would generate infeasible solutions (doubling some positions and excluding others). Therefore BCP is better suited by an operator such as the linear order crossover operator (Davis, 1985, pp.…”
Section: Crossover Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children are generated by exchanging parents' strings. However, in BCP the only difference between an individual and another is the order in which the elements of the chromosome are permuted, and in most cases it makes no sense to talk of pure recombination (Djerid & Portmann, 2000), since the association of different parents would generate infeasible solutions (doubling some positions and excluding others). Therefore BCP is better suited by an operator such as the linear order crossover operator (Davis, 1985, pp.…”
Section: Crossover Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some different encodings are proposed in the literature [20,21]. These encodings are split into two categories.…”
Section: ))mentioning
confidence: 99%