2017
DOI: 10.1111/nph.14509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to know the fungi: combining field inventories and DNA‐barcoding to document fungal diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2017), and uncultured ectomycorrhizal Mucoromycotina (Tedersoo et al 2008). Below we circumscribe this monophyletic sister lineage that has been referred to previously as the Sphaerocreas - Densospora clade (Yamamoto et al 2015, Truong et al 2017) as the new family Densosporaceae .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2017), and uncultured ectomycorrhizal Mucoromycotina (Tedersoo et al 2008). Below we circumscribe this monophyletic sister lineage that has been referred to previously as the Sphaerocreas - Densospora clade (Yamamoto et al 2015, Truong et al 2017) as the new family Densosporaceae .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This group has previously been referred to as the Sphaerocreas - Densospora clade (Yamamoto et al 2015, Truong et al 2017). Due to limited taxon and/or gene sampling in previous (Lin et al 2014; Spatafora et al 2016) and present studies, there is still uncertainty regarding the diversity and relationships among Densosporaceae and the phylogenetic position of Endogonales within Mucoromycotina .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Isolates AZ0501, TLT265, and YP243 clustered together within a well-supported monophyletic clade that branched after early diverging lineages such us Calcarisporiella (Hirose et al 2012), Densospora (McGee 1996), Endogone (Yamamoto et al 2015), and Sphaerocreas (Hirose et al 2014) and unidentified Mucoromycotina (Truong et al 2017) (FIG. 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%