1995
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560041120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein

Abstract: The molar absorption coefficient, E, of a protein is usually based on concentrations measured by dry weight, nitrogen, or amino acid analysis. The studies reported here suggest that the Edelhoch method is the best method for measuring E for a protein. (This method is described by Gill and von Hippel [1989, Anal Biochem 182:319-3261 and is based on data from Edelhoch [ , Biochemistry 6:1948.) The absorbance of a protein at 280 nm depends on the content of Trp, Tyr, and cystine (disulfide bonds). The average E … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

38
2,908
0
32

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,811 publications
(2,978 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
38
2,908
0
32
Order By: Relevance
“…Frozen aliquots of scMN+8 were reconditioned to the correct buffer with a NAP-10 column (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, U.K.). The protein concentrations were spectrophotometrically determined at 280 nm with the extinction coefficients 1490 M −1 cm −1 for CB, 67 14600 M −1 cm −1 for scMN, 68 and 3200 M −1 cm −1 for calmodulin. 69 To retain CB in the apo form, 200 μM EDTA was added to all buffers.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frozen aliquots of scMN+8 were reconditioned to the correct buffer with a NAP-10 column (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, U.K.). The protein concentrations were spectrophotometrically determined at 280 nm with the extinction coefficients 1490 M −1 cm −1 for CB, 67 14600 M −1 cm −1 for scMN, 68 and 3200 M −1 cm −1 for calmodulin. 69 To retain CB in the apo form, 200 μM EDTA was added to all buffers.…”
Section: ■ Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein concentration was determined using the extinction coefficient of ε = 9 800 M -1 cm -1 at 278 nm for RNase A and 9 940 M -1 cm -1 for the disulfide variants according to the calculations by Pace et al [43].…”
Section: Determination Of the Protein Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of a pure protein may be determined by quantifying absorbance at 280 nm [16][17][18]. Most of the absorbance of proteins at this wavelength is due to the sidechains of the aromatic amino acids tryptophan and tyrosine.…”
Section: Exercise 4: Luxg-his 6 Concentration By Direct Spectrophotommentioning
confidence: 99%