2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.23.21254181
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to quantify deaths averted derived from interrupted time-series analyses

Abstract: Background Interrupted time series (ITS) are an important tool for determining whether alcohol control policies, as well as other policy interventions, are successful over and above secular trends or chance. Subsequent to estimating whether a policy has had an effect, quantifying the key outcomes, such as the number of prevented deaths, is of primary practical importance. The current paper compares the results of two different methodological approaches to quantify deaths averted using different two standard … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was surprising that restricting opening hours of alcohol sales (a ‘best buy’ policy included in Policy 3) had no discernable effect on cirrhosis mortality rates, but this null finding may be due to its position in the time series, that is, the policy was implemented towards the end of the dataset with insufficient data points to establish this effect. A recent simulation study found that when policy effects are positioned towards the end of a dataset, the estimated impact of a policy effect may not be as accurately captured with an interrupted time‐series analysis 32 . In addition, the null effect of the various measures in Policy 3 may also have been be due to the fact that this intervention is expected to have more of an impact on causes of death associated with acute harm due to alcohol (rather than a chronic disease) 37‐39 or in the case of advertisement and marketing restrictions, have more long term effects via changing the culture 40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was surprising that restricting opening hours of alcohol sales (a ‘best buy’ policy included in Policy 3) had no discernable effect on cirrhosis mortality rates, but this null finding may be due to its position in the time series, that is, the policy was implemented towards the end of the dataset with insufficient data points to establish this effect. A recent simulation study found that when policy effects are positioned towards the end of a dataset, the estimated impact of a policy effect may not be as accurately captured with an interrupted time‐series analysis 32 . In addition, the null effect of the various measures in Policy 3 may also have been be due to the fact that this intervention is expected to have more of an impact on causes of death associated with acute harm due to alcohol (rather than a chronic disease) 37‐39 or in the case of advertisement and marketing restrictions, have more long term effects via changing the culture 40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the impact of the significant policy effects, we produced a counterfactual estimate of the mortality rate for the policies. Based on the methods of Jiang et al, 32 for each significant policy, we created a GAMM model for the mortality rates leading up to their implementation based on the covariates only. We then used these counterfactual GAMM models (models without the policy effect included) to predict the mortality rate for the 12 months following the introduction of the policy.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct Methodology Deaths avoided were directly estimated using methodology based on interrupted time-series [21,22]. As these procedures have been reported in detail elsewhere [20,23], the models will only be briefly described here. The methodology compares the actual deaths after an intervention, with an estimate of the deaths which would have happened without the intervention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will perform interrupted time series analyses, testing the impact of the 2017 rise in alcohol excise taxation using generalized additive mixed models (following recommendations of Beard and colleagues:[22]; previous applications on Lithuanian mortality data:[15-17]). For this, we will first build baseline models with control variables (secular trend, unemployment, GDP) and then include the policy variable to test for an immediate level change in the dependent variable.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] The most robust evidence for reduction in mortality has converged for an increase in alcohol excise taxes (111-112% for wines and beer; 23% for ethyl alcohol), implemented on 1 March 2017. [14, 17]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%