2010
DOI: 10.5070/p72tr4s97h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Study a Tone Language, with Exemplification from Oku (Grassfields Bantu, Cameroon)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, only L should be specified while H should remain underspecified. However, Hyman (2010) observes that the L vs Ø contrast, although confirmed for some languages, is very rare. In this analysis, we do not take a strong position on this matter, but assuming that only High tones are active in Xitshwa, we propose to specify High tone with acute accents (΄), while syllables with Low tones will be underspecified, yielding a H vs Ø system.…”
Section: Background Information On Xitshwa Tonementioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That is, only L should be specified while H should remain underspecified. However, Hyman (2010) observes that the L vs Ø contrast, although confirmed for some languages, is very rare. In this analysis, we do not take a strong position on this matter, but assuming that only High tones are active in Xitshwa, we propose to specify High tone with acute accents (΄), while syllables with Low tones will be underspecified, yielding a H vs Ø system.…”
Section: Background Information On Xitshwa Tonementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Several accounts on Bantu languages also suggest that Low tones do not play any role in the Phonological Component and that only H should be specified (Downing & Mtenje 2017, Hyman 2010, Hyman & Ngunga 1994, Marlo 2016, Odden 1998, Polleto 1998. Ngunga & Faquir (2011) have suggested that the contrast between H vs L in Xitshwa should be L vs Ø.…”
Section: Background Information On Xitshwa Tonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Final intonational rises are common in our wordlist data, likely as a result of eliciting words in a repeated frame sentence. In such tasks, the target word is pragmatically or metalinguistically focussed, and may be produced with intonation characteristic of a full, independent utterance or IP (Himmelmann, 2006; Himmelmann & Ladd, 2008; Hyman, 2014; Jun & Fletcher, 2014; Pike, 1948; Snider, 2014; Yu, 2014). A particularly dramatic example is shown in Figure 36.…”
Section: Prosodymentioning
confidence: 99%