How to Write a Scholarly Book Review for Publication in a Peer-Reviewed Journal: A Review of the Literature

Abstract

Purpose: To describe and discuss the processes used to write scholarly book reviews for publication in peer-reviewed journals and to provide a recommended strategy and book appraisal worksheet to use when conducting book reviews. Methods: A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature was conducted in June 2009 using a combination of controlled vocabulary and truncated text words to capture articles relevant to writing scholarly book reviews for publication in peerreviewed journals. Results: The initial search identified 839 citations. Following the removal of duplicates and the application of selection criteria, a total of 78 articles were included in this review including narrative commentaries (n D 26), editorials or journal announcements (n D 25), original research (n D 18), and journal correspondence pieces (n D 9). Discussion: Recommendations for planning and writing an objective and quality book review are presented based on the evidence gleaned from the articles reviewed and from the authors' experiences. A worksheet for conducting a book review is provided. Conclusions: The scholarly book review serves many purposes and has the potential to be an influential literary form. The process of publishing a successful scholarly book review requires the reviewer to appreciate the book review publication process and to be aware of the skills and strategies involved in writing a successful review. (J Chiropr Educ 2010;24(1):57-69)

Writing Reviews of Books and Other Media for the Journal of Mixed Methods Research

“…Media reviews serve many purposes: notifying readers of new and valuable resources, giving information to readers and libraries to make purchase decisions, and informing authors who may be developing future editions of the media under review (Lee et al, 2010). Thus, the readership is perhaps the primary beneficiary of a media review.…”

“…Media reviews become a valuable decision tool when looking for resources. Nevertheless, writing a media review benefits the reviewer through the contribution made to the scholarly literature that alerts readers to valuable texts and warns of subpar media (Lee et al, 2010). It is also an opportunity critically think about media and subsequently add a publication to your curriculum vitae.…”

Academic book reviewing: between opportunity and responsibility

“…The literature on academic book reviewing (see Lee, Green, Johnson, & Nyquist, 2010, for an overview) stretches back surprisingly far. Decades ago, the challenges involved in modern scholarly journals were defined with admirable lucidity in a Science editorial identifying negative role models:…”

The effectiveness of using flipbook maker to improve the chemistry learning outcomes of senior high school students

“…Someone will learn better from text and image media than text media alone, so that students can get better learning outcomes, then students must first have an interest in the material learned. According to Lee et al (2010) the book is one of the media and is an important access to education in the delivery of national education. In addition, how teachers can be facilitate students reading needs is an issue that also needs attention for us (Sukmawati, 2016).…”