2023
DOI: 10.5603/fm.a2022.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to write an umbrella review? A step-by-step tutorial with tips and tricks

Abstract: This article has been peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance.It is an open access article, which means that it can be downloaded, printed, and distributed freely, provided the work is properly cited. Articles in "Folia Morphologica" are listed in PubMed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A random‐effects model was made. To assess the heterogeneity among the studies, the Chi‐square test and the I‐squared statistic were conducted (Bonczar et al, 2022; Higgins et al, 2019). A p ‐value and confidence intervals were used to determine the statistical significance between studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A random‐effects model was made. To assess the heterogeneity among the studies, the Chi‐square test and the I‐squared statistic were conducted (Bonczar et al, 2022; Higgins et al, 2019). A p ‐value and confidence intervals were used to determine the statistical significance between studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A random effects model was used. The Chi‐square test and the I ‐squared statistic were chosen to assess the heterogeneity among the studies (Bonczar, Ostrowski, et al, 2022; Henry et al, 2016; Higgins et al, 2019). P‐values and confidence intervals were used to determine the statistical significance between the studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A random‐effects model was used in all analyses. The heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated, using both the Chi‐squared test and the I‐squared statistic 16,17 . The I‐squared statistic was interpreted as follows: 0%–40% as ‘might not be important’; 30%–60% as ‘may represent moderate heterogeneity’; 50%–90% as ‘may represent substantial heterogeneity’; 75%–100% as ‘may represent considerable heterogeneity’.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%