2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Can Modulate Implicit Motor Sequence Learning and Consolidation: A Brief Review

Abstract: The purpose of this review is to investigate how transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can modulate implicit motor sequence learning and consolidation. So far, most of the studies have focused on the modulating effect of tDCS for explicit motor learning. Here, we focus explicitly on implicit motor sequence learning and consolidation in order to improve our understanding about the potential of tDCS to affect this kind of unconscious learning. Specifically, we concentrate on studies with the serial reac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
8
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ER was calculated for each block of all the SRTT runs. The GMS score represents the speeding up of RTs across sequential blocks due to practice (Savic and Meier, 2016). Specifically, the GMS score is the mean RT difference between two sequential blocks and served as a measure of GMS learning and consolidation.…”
Section: Srtt Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ER was calculated for each block of all the SRTT runs. The GMS score represents the speeding up of RTs across sequential blocks due to practice (Savic and Meier, 2016). Specifically, the GMS score is the mean RT difference between two sequential blocks and served as a measure of GMS learning and consolidation.…”
Section: Srtt Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations have used tDCS to either modulate learning or to better understand the underlying learning processes (Orban de Xivry and Shadmehr, 2014; Savic and Meier, 2016). However, the number of brain regions involved in skill learning is vast (Ungerleider et al, 2002) which has led to various targeted brain regions for tDCS application, electrode montages, and types of motor tasks.…”
Section: Modulating Motor Learning Processes Through Tdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the neurophysiological effects of motor cortex tDCS can remain for a considerable period after stimulation (Nitsche & Paulus, 2000, also the impact on motor performance might outlast the stimulation itself. TDCS influences both motor learning (Nitsche, Schauenburg, et al, 2003;Savic & Meier, 2016) and performance of simple motor and cognitive tasks (Nozari¸Woodard, & Thompson-Schill, 2014) when stimulation is applied during task execution. However, for relatively simple RT tasks, tDCS applied before performance may also induce functional alterations (Devanathan & Madhavan, 2016;Müller, Orosz, Treszl, Schmid, Sperner, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TDCS-generated neuroplasticity is thought to enhance learning-related plasticity (LTP) when task performance and stimulation are conducted simultaneously. Indeed, LTP-like plasticity-inducing tDCS improved motor learning when stimulation was applied during task performance (Nitsche, Schauenburg, et al, 2003;Savic & Meier, 2016). When the effect of anodal and cathodal tDCS on motor performance was tested by applying stimulation either during or before task performance, faster learning was found by anodal tDCS only when stimulation was applied during task performance .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%