2015
DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v4n1p147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Useful are the Main Existing Theories of Ethnic Conflict?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethnicity and ethnic group formation have been apprehended along the lines of three major approaches: primordialism, the first approach, emphasises the archaic, cultural basis of ethnic identities (Berman 1998) and perceives an ethnic group as an objective entity (Perez and Hirschman 2009 cited in Williams 2015). This approach assumes that ethnic identities are ‘given’ and not chosen, that is, ‘attachments’ derived from place of birth, kinship relationship, religion, language and social practices are ‘natural’ for every person and this provides a basis for an easy ‘affinity’ with other peoples from the same background (Brass 1991).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ethnicity and ethnic group formation have been apprehended along the lines of three major approaches: primordialism, the first approach, emphasises the archaic, cultural basis of ethnic identities (Berman 1998) and perceives an ethnic group as an objective entity (Perez and Hirschman 2009 cited in Williams 2015). This approach assumes that ethnic identities are ‘given’ and not chosen, that is, ‘attachments’ derived from place of birth, kinship relationship, religion, language and social practices are ‘natural’ for every person and this provides a basis for an easy ‘affinity’ with other peoples from the same background (Brass 1991).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach assumes that ethnic identities are ‘given’ and not chosen, that is, ‘attachments’ derived from place of birth, kinship relationship, religion, language and social practices are ‘natural’ for every person and this provides a basis for an easy ‘affinity’ with other peoples from the same background (Brass 1991). This perspective considers ethnic identity as ascriptive, timeless and fixed with defined social boundaries (Poata-Smith 2013 cited in Williams 2015). Ethnic ties are assumed as inherent, producing natural divisions—based on race, religion, language or location—with others (Geertz 1973: 250 cited in Williams 2015).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primordialism posits that the membership of such grouping is fixed and is passed down from one generation to another. Therefore, ethnic membership and/or differences are ancestral just as the resultant ethnic conflicts are (Geertz 1973;Joireman 2003;Williams 2015). In this manner, primordialism speaks to the foundation of ethnic character and its vast implications for individuals; of ancient and modern times.…”
Section: Primordialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethnic unrest has been a part of international society through history and it is a highly contested phenomenon and still is a part of 21 st C, generally, the scholarly debated on ethnic conflict is categorized into three major theories of ethnic conflict i.e. Primordialism, Instrumentalism, and Constructivism (Williams, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%