How valid are the rates of Down syndrome internationally? Findings from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research

Abstract

Rates of Down syndrome (DS) show considerable international variation, but a systematic assessment of this variation is lacking. The goal of this study was to develop and test a method to assess the validity of DS rates in surveillance programs, as an indicator of quality of ascertainment. The proposed method compares the observed number of cases with DS (livebirths plus elective pregnancy terminations, adjusted for spontaneous fetal losses that would have occurred if the pregnancy had been allowed to continue) in each single year of maternal age, with the expected number of cases based on the best-published data on rates by year of maternal age. To test this method we used data from birth years 2000 to 2005 from 32 surveillance programs of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. We computed the adjusted observed versus expected ratio (aOE) of DS birth prevalence among women 25-44 years old. The aOE ratio was close to unity in 13 programs (the 95% confidence interval included 1), above 1 in 2 programs and below 1 in 18 programs (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that DS rates internationally can be evaluated simply and systematically, and underscores how adjusting for spontaneous fetal loss is crucial and feasible. The aOE ratio can help better interpret and compare the reported rates, measure the degree of under- or over-registration, and promote quality improvement in surveillance programs that will ultimately provide better data for research, service planning, and public health programs.

Prevalence of esophageal atresia among 18 international birth defects surveillance programs

“…We used the term total prevalence instead of prevalence or birth prevalence to underline that ETOPFA was also included. To validate the total prevalence, we undertook a sensitivity analysis by comparing overall total prevalence to estimated result for six programs previously shown to have good ascertainment of birth defects (Leoncini et al, 2010). Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) for prevalence were calculated based on the Poisson distribution.…”

National centralization of biliary atresia care to an assigned multidisciplinary team provides high-quality outcomes

“…The notified diagnoses from national healthrelated registers are confirmed from the hospitals. The validity of the Register of Congenital Malformations is considered good and has been ascertained in several studies [18][19][20].…”

Abnormal MicroRNA Expression in Ts65Dn Hippocampus and Whole Blood: Contributions to Down Syndrome Phenotypes

“…It is a common noninheritable genetic disorder, occurring in approximately 1 out of every 590 live births worldwide (calculated based on recently published multinational epidemiological results [4]). Some of the most prominent features of the DS phenotype include mental retardation as well as an increased incidence of congenital heart disease, hypothyroidism and leukemia [5,6,7].…”