2017
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggx370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How wind turbines affect the performance of seismic monitoring stations and networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study demonstrate that seismic arrays can be used to detect and quantify flight parameters of aircrafts (these should include low flying and stealth airplanes that evade radar detection). The presented results contribute to the growing recognition of different types of surface and atmospheric events (e.g., car traffic, trains, storms, wind turbines, and air traffic) producing signals that are contained in observed seismograms (e.g., Eibl et al, ; Fuchs & Bokelmann, ; Neuffer & Kremers, ; Salvermoser et al, ; Tanimoto & Valovcin, ). In the study area near Anza California, the total duration of air traffic signals (> 7% of the day) is likely larger than the duration covered by earthquake signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The results of this study demonstrate that seismic arrays can be used to detect and quantify flight parameters of aircrafts (these should include low flying and stealth airplanes that evade radar detection). The presented results contribute to the growing recognition of different types of surface and atmospheric events (e.g., car traffic, trains, storms, wind turbines, and air traffic) producing signals that are contained in observed seismograms (e.g., Eibl et al, ; Fuchs & Bokelmann, ; Neuffer & Kremers, ; Salvermoser et al, ; Tanimoto & Valovcin, ). In the study area near Anza California, the total duration of air traffic signals (> 7% of the day) is likely larger than the duration covered by earthquake signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The interpretations may result in more adapted strategies to reduce WT vibrations and thus help for improved structural health and structural health monitoring. In addition, damping of WT vibrations should reduce ground motion emissions and thus mitigate the disturbances of sensitive measurements near to WTs . The latter is crucial for permitting new WTs, eg, in the vicinity of seismic recording stations, which have protection radii as wide as 5 km due to too high emission amplitudes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clear differences between the two recording sites can be observed in the frequency spectra due to propagation effects. The amplitude decay of the induced seismic signals was already analyzed by previous studies and is beyond the scope of the present study. Nevertheless, we show the seismic data of the station WD01A to underline the impact of the induced seismic signals on nearby seismic stations.…”
Section: Seismic Signals On Top Of the Wt Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such violations of the assumption of stationary noise sources might be avoided by using repeating and localized seismic sources, similar to repeating earthquakes that are being used for coda wave interferometry (Snieder, 2006). Environmental seismological research has identified a vast amount of such sources (Larose et al, 2015), e.g., river noise (Burtin et al, 2011), tremors in the cryosphere (Bartholomaus et al, 2015), and anthropogentic structures (Saccorotti et al, 2011;Neuffer and Kremers, 2017). 20 In this study we explore the potential of the HVSR method for permafrost active layer monitoring using continuous seismic noise records of several months from a temporary seismic deployment close to Ny Ålesund on the Arctic archipelago of Svalbard ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%